Search for: "Ex Parte Bird" Results 61 - 80 of 104
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2013, 8:09 pm by Vincent LoTempio
In an Ex parte reexamination the filing party no longer participates in the examination process. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 2:32 pm
This patent was granted in 2003 by the USPTO and has been under an ex-parte examination for several months. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:36 pm
Waxwing birds became wickedly intoxicated, after they ate fermented Scandinavian berries. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 10:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
 The paper’s editorial says the U.S. homeland should be considered part of the battlefield, and Tsarnaev deemed an “enemy combatant. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 8:00 am
Apologies for the most obvious but irresistible caption to appear on this blog in 10 years:"Bambi consults with Bird & Bird" Personally this Kat is relieved that this litigation has not yet reached the point at which, shrieking "a plague on both your houses!" [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 7:07 am by Broc Romanek
Investors would pay ex ante for any benefit received ex post--and the bar would pocket a substantial portion of the transfer payments." [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:00 am by Steve McConnell
We couldn't even muster the energy to water the lawn or refill the bird feeders. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:40 am by Randy Barnett
Such a declaration of agreement on my part would not be worth much to anybody. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 1:06 pm by Jeffrey J. Randa
At this point, it really doesn't matter which it was, because either way, they've more or less flipped you the bird in terms of gratitude and respect for the break you gave them. [read post]
28 May 2012, 8:30 am by Andrew & Danielle Mayoras
So he held a trial to determine if Price and Coleman really were the love-birds Price claimed they were.  [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
My candidate for a good boundary definition is materiality: used to be an inherent part of the test for trademark infringement, because infringement required harm, and harm was lost sales—it would have to be something that made a difference to consumers in a purchasing decision False advertising law has kept that requirement, but TM jettisoned it, creating a [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 4:25 am by Anita Davies
Peers tried and failed to amend those parts of the bill that apply to victims of domestic violence.   [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 2:32 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Big issues: ex ante v. ex post examination; property v. liability rules; what do we want to protect, exactly; also how the design patent system relates to product design trade dress protection. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 6:21 am by Broc Romanek
Here, the total value range reported under the Sum of the Parts analysis was $7.74 to $10.42 and the ex-corporate valuation range, which excluded the costs of running Micromet, was $8.92 to $11.60. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 2:36 pm
Indeed, the book strives for an objectively neutral, bird's-eye view of the dispute, which allows the partisans on each side of the current divide to speak in their own voices. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:14 am by Ted Frank
And somehow, it's hard to think that the aggressor was the one who had to miss the ex parte hearing because of a mandatory chemotherapy session with his oncologist. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 9:32 pm by Kenneth Anderson
They need bases, mechanics, spare parts, fuel — there’s nothing “global” about that.   [read post]