Search for: "Ex Parte Buchanan" Results 21 - 40 of 75
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2011, 5:12 am
The effect of losing a scholarship amounts to making the scholarship worth one-third of its apparent value ex ante. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
It is truly odd that lawyers across the political spectrum have acted as if the provision creating the pardon power is unambiguous, when it is anything but.The Supreme Court case to which naïve reporters point, 1866’s Ex Parte Garland, does indeed say that the pardon power is “unlimited,” but that opinion then very clearly describes a pardon power that is in fact limited. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
A January 26 piece asserts confidently that “[t]he Supreme Court has ruled that the Constitution gives presidents unlimited authority to grant pardons,” but the link embedded in “pardons” leads to another Times column that does not support that assertion.What these journalists seem to be relying upon, other than citing each other’s unsourced assertions, is the Court’s 1866 decision in Ex Parte Garland. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
And that’s the danger.This is actually not an argument at all, because all he is saying is that convicting Trump could affect other ex-presidents “in a negative way,” which is “the danger. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 2:47 am
" Applicant also pointed to the lack of evidence of actual confusion, but the Board pointed out that "in ex parte cases, the owner of the cited registration is not a party and there is generally no way to know whether the registration owner is likewise unaware of any instances of actual confusion, nor is it usually possible to determine that there has been any significant opportunity for actual confusion to have occurred. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
” move—is among Republican politicians.I write this column because a big part of my research and writing over the past fifteen years or so has been devoted to exploring questions of justice between generations. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 9:04 am
"***Separately, see the BPAI decision in Ex parte KooIn view of In re Bilski, 2007-1130, slip op. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 8:26 pm
 The Lisa case supports the vital principle that words – especially where delivered by a prosecutor in ex parte fashion to a grand jury – matter. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 1:34 pm by Kim Zetter
(Friðrik Tryggvason/Wikimedia Commons) See also: Feds Subpoena Twitter Seeking Information on Ex-WikiLeaks Volunteers Eff, ACLU Challenge Feds WikiLeaks Twitter Probe [read post]
20 May 2019, 2:32 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Committee on Oversight and Reform: I do, therefore, . . . solemnly protest against these proceedings of the House of Representatives, because they are in violation of the rights of the coordinate executive branch of the Government, and subversive of its constitutional independence; because they are calculated to foster a band of interested parasites and informers, ever ready, for their own advantage, to swear before ex parte committees to pretended… [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 5:28 am by kevin-vonkamecke
I firmly believe it is a mistake to have ex parte communication with a custody evaluator, so in this instance I would copy opposing counsel on my letter to the evaluator or PC. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 4:04 pm by Kevin Poulsen
The Justice Department’s demand for the records is part of a grand jury investigation that appears to be probing WikiLeaks for its high-profile leaks of classified U.S. material. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 5:46 am by Michael C. Dorf
Thus, Egbert has no bearing on Disney's suit for declaratory and injunctive relief against state officials (where both a federal statute and the doctrine of Ex Parte Young provide causes of action).Even so, as Prof Buchanan observed in his essay here yesterday, there is a prima facie similarity between Disney's lawsuit and the challenge to the third version of Trump's Travel Ban that SCOTUS rejected in Trump v. [read post]
6 May 2007, 1:53 pm
" While Roger Taney in Ex Parte Merryman (1861) condemned Abraham Lincoln for declaring martial law and ignoring a writ of habeas corpus, in 1843 the future Chief Justice described as "disgraceful" Judge Dominick Augustan Hall's effort to challenge Andrew Jackson's similar declaration. [read post]