Search for: "Ex Parte Coleman" Results 61 - 80 of 92
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2011, 6:59 am by Randy Coleman
  Imagine having your ex-spouse, with whom you have just concluded a lengthy and acrimonious divorce, being called to make decisions on your medical treatment or end of life decisions!? [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am by Kelly
(Ron Coleman’s Likelihood of Confusion) ONEL – Pieter Veeze’s 2010 Markenforum speech (Class 46) France Cour d’appel Paris: French law implementing London Protocol procedural so to be enforced immediately with retroactive effect: Unilever v. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
One way to approach this question is via a typology--a scheme that divides the general and abstract concept of justice into component parts: (1) distributive justice, (2) corrective justice, (3) political justice, (4) procedural justice, and (5) retributive justice. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:38 am by Stephen E. Sachs
Of course it's possible for that new language to have conflicted with other parts of the Constitution, parts it wasn't being adopted "in lieu of. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 8:52 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
How and Why Texas is Different When it Comes to Trade Secrets and Restrictive Covenants View the Recording In this program, Seyfarth attorneys Jesse Coleman, Matt Simmons, and Kevin Green outlined recent legal developments in Texas trade secret and non-compete law and how it is similar to and diverse from other jurisdictions. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 12:05 pm
  Lawyers and non-lawyers also privilege different objectives, in part on the basis of the ideologies of their fields. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:25 pm by Kelly
Dickinson Wright and John Artz (Patently-O) (PharmaPatents) BPAI: Removing terminal disclaimers by patent reissue: Ex parte Shunpei Yamazaki (Patents Post Grant Blog) District Court N D Ohio: Equitable intervening rights: Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC, et al v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 7:38 am
One can’t compare the control group against a self-selected sample of the treatment group, nor can one compare self-selected parts of the treatment group (high Bible study participants) against other self-selected parts (low Bible study participants). [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am by INFORRM
On 13 March 2012, Tugendhat J heard an application in Iqbal v Mansoor & ors and gave an ex tempore judgment. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:50 pm by The Blog Team
Scott, Coleman, Balogh & Scott LLP, San Diego, CA)   United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
County of Allegheny, No. 06-2869 "In an action against various defendants for violations of 42 U.S.C. section 1983 and state law, arising from a former 911 dispatcher's improper use of his job facilities to track down and kill his ex-girlfriend and her boyfriend, plaintiff's son, dismissal of the claims is reversed in part and the matter remanded with instructions to permit plaintiff an opportunity to amend certain state-created danger and equal protection claims, as… [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:36 pm by Adam Thierer
  Section 202 goes further by, among other means, proscribing common carriers from “unreasonable discrimination in charges, practices, classifications, regulations, facilities, or services…” Similar language can be found in the six Net Neutrality principles proposed by the FCC as part of its Open Internet / Net Neutrality Proceeding.[11] The Court of Appeals in Comcast v. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 7:01 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Protecting Trade Secrets and Enforcing Restrictive Covenants Internationally View the Recording In the second webinar of the 2022 series, Seyfarth partners Jesse Coleman, Dan Hart, and Caitlin Lane discussed how to identify the greatest threats to trade secrets, provided tips and best practices for protecting trade secrets abroad, and covered enforcement mechanisms and remedies internationally and in the US. [read post]