Search for: "Ex Parte Communication with Former Employees of Corporate Defendants"
Results 1 - 20
of 183
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2008, 1:13 pm
Yorktowne Cabinetry, Judge Urbanski denied the defendant's motion for an order prohibiting ex parte contact between the plaintiff and the defendant's former employees, distinguishing the earlier decision by Judge Sargent in Armsey v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 8:00 am
The dissent proposed the following standard: “Did the communications with the former employee, whenever they occurred, relate to the former employee’s conduct and knowledge, or communication with defendant’s counsel, during his or her employment? [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 8:00 am
The dissent proposed the following standard: “Did the communications with the former employee, whenever they occurred, relate to the former employee’s conduct and knowledge, or communication with defendant’s counsel, during his or her employment? [read post]
15 May 2019, 7:29 am
In January 2018 Mr Justice Birss found in favour of various former employees of Invista Textiles who had set up their own business shortly after leaving Invista. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 5:52 am
Ex. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 8:44 am
A case in which our firm defended a former Motorola executive was covered in Crain’s Chicago business. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 7:01 am
Trade secret law has profound effects on employee mobility; the vast majority of trade secret litigation in this country involves employees moving from one company to another (and allegedly taking their former employer’s trade secrets with them). [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm
On 2 March 2022, Nicklin J gave an ex tempore judgment dismissing the libel claim in Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation v Burgis. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 6:07 pm
It was a case noteworthy in part for the characterization of opposing positions as “nonsense on stilts” by former Chancellor William B. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:48 am
April 26, 2013), the court sanctioned a former employee of the plaintiff because he disposed of his cell phone after his duty to preserve arose. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
National/Federal A Pro-Trump Group Organizing a DC Rally for Jan. 6 Defendants Lost Its Tax-Exempt Status – but Is Still Claiming Donations Are Tax-Deductible Yahoo News – Charles Davis (Business Insider) | Published: 9/8/2021 A group founded by a former Trump campaign staffer that is organizing a rally on behalf of January 6 defendants is soliciting “tax-deductible” contributions despite losing its tax-exempt status last year. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Excerpt: Introduction, Part I introduction & Part II. [read post]
13 May 2007, 2:44 pm
The Court of Appeals made clear that ex parte communications with nonmanagerial employees are permitted, but adversary counsel are prohibited from directly communicating with employees who have the power to bind the corporation in litigation, are charged with carrying out the advice of the corporation's attorney, or are considered organizational members possessing a stake in the representationSince the officer was no longer… [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
But they are concerned corporate lobbyists could influence it beyond its intended scope. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
National/Federal Ex-Congressman Asks 11th Circuit to Toss Six-Figure Campaign Finance Penalty Courthouse News Service – Kayla Gogging | Published: 4/16/2024 Former U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 2:37 pm
Values and standards are clearly communicated. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm
The article below addresses another aspect of employees moving from one company to another -- agreements between two or more competitive corporations not to solicit, or hire, each other's employees. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 3:25 pm
Judge Yerger's opinion states that Eaton in-house counsel were aware of Ed Peters' improper ex parte contacts with Judge DeLaughter. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:55 am
LINDA MARIE BROGA, Appellee. 1st District.Dissolution of marriage -- Income -- Attorney's fees -- Trial court abused discretion by imputing income equal to minimum wage for a forty-hour workweek to former wife, without considering her pay from Army Reserves, while including in husband's income his pension and disability benefits in addition to a full-time imputed minimum wage -- It was improper to consider former husband's secondary sources of income while ignoring… [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 8:48 am
Petitioners originally brought action against the corporation to hold it accountable for the actions of its human agents, including the chairman, the board, and other high-ranking employees. [read post]
