Search for: "Ex Parte Crossley" Results 1 - 2 of 2
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2014, 3:59 am by INFORRM
  In R v Legal Aid Board, ex p Kaim Todner ([1999] QB 966), the Court stated that it was important not to forget why proceedings need to be held under the full glare of a public hearing because there was a natural tendency for the general principle to be eroded. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 7:18 am by GuestPost
However, in some circumstances, such as a childless, short marriage without pooling of assets a prenuptial agreement may have ‘magnetic importance’ for the division of assets (as shown in Crossley v Crossley [2008] 1 FLR 1467). [read post]