Search for: "Ex Parte Crouch"
Results 1 - 20
of 153
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2013, 5:18 am
As a reminder, in ex parte cases, the PTAB reviews rejections by the patent examiner. [read post]
1 May 2013, 12:16 pm
By Dennis Crouch The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) is turning a corner in terms of its backlog of pending ex parte appeals with a significant drop in the backlog in March 2013. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:15 am
Ex parte appeals are no different. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 2:42 pm
by Dennis Crouch The vast majority of ex parte patent appeals (92%) are focused on obviousness, with 2/3 of those only addressing obviousness questions. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 11:02 pm
By Dennis Crouch The chart above provides further analysis from the prior post entitled Ex Parte Appeal Outcome by Assignee 2005-2013. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 8:32 am
by Dennis Crouch A new petition by Pactiv (a Reynolds Co.) asks the Supreme Court to consider whether the PTO can expand the scope of an ex parte reexamination beyond the “substantial new question of patentability” identified in the Director’s order granting the reexamination. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 12:16 pm
By Dennis Crouch The PTAB continues to work on its 26,000+ backlog of ex parte appeals pending at the USPTO. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 10:00 am
At the same time, a 25,000 case backlog of pending ex parte appeals persists at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 6:15 am
by Dennis Crouch The PTAB continues to show signs of taking control of its ex parte appeals docket. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 9:35 pm
By Dennis Crouch Ex Parte Gross (PTAB 2014) Patent attorney J. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 12:56 pm
Patenting Device Attached to a Human is OK: Ex Parte Robert S. [read post]
5 May 2007, 1:45 pm
Eighteen months later, her assignment finished, Crouch called her ex-husband??? [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 1:58 pm
By Dennis Crouch Ex parte Mewherter (PTAB 2013) The USPTO has recently designated Ex parte Mewherter as a precedential decision with regards to its treatment of rejections under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 7:18 am
On January 20, 2010, the USPTO moderated a public roundtable discussion to obtain public comments on the proposed rules modifications in connection with ex parte appeals before the USPTO’s Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI). [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 7:41 pm
by Dennis Crouch I was reading recent PTAB ex parte cases looking to see how the Office is handling enablement questions. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:13 am
Note: Although this case involves an ex parte reexamination, the principles here apply equally with ordinary ex parte examination. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 4:44 am
By Dennis Crouch Ex Parte Ciprian Agapi, 2013 WL 6039024 (PTAB 2013) The PTAB continues to decide a large number of subject matter eligibility issues. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 11:44 am
As part of an ex parte reexamination process, the Board of Patent Appeals (BPAI) found Antor's patent claims invalid as both anticipated and obvious based upon the combination of four prior art references. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 8:31 am
By Dennis Crouch This is a continuation of an analysis of ex parte appeal decision outcomes at the US Patent Office (USPTO). [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 7:30 am
By Dennis Crouch Ex parte Gerlitz, APPEAL 2017-002398, 2018 WL 619852 (PTAB Jan. 26, 2018) GlucoVista’s patent application claims a method of determining glucose concentration in a body (i.e., physical matter) by changing the body’s surface temperature and measuring the change in infrared (IR) radiation emitted at the wavelength associated with Glucose IR emissions. [read post]
