Search for: "Ex Parte Crouch"
Results 1 - 20
of 138
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2012, 9:15 am
Ex parte appeals are no different. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 2:42 pm
by Dennis Crouch The vast majority of ex parte patent appeals (92%) are focused on obviousness, with 2/3 of those only addressing obviousness questions. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 8:32 am
by Dennis Crouch A new petition by Pactiv (a Reynolds Co.) asks the Supreme Court to consider whether the PTO can expand the scope of an ex parte reexamination beyond the “substantial new question of patentability” identified in the Director’s order granting the reexamination. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 10:00 am
At the same time, a 25,000 case backlog of pending ex parte appeals persists at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 7:18 am
On January 20, 2010, the USPTO moderated a public roundtable discussion to obtain public comments on the proposed rules modifications in connection with ex parte appeals before the USPTO’s Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI). [read post]
5 May 2007, 1:45 pm
Eighteen months later, her assignment finished, Crouch called her ex-husband??? [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 7:41 pm
by Dennis Crouch I was reading recent PTAB ex parte cases looking to see how the Office is handling enablement questions. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:13 am
Note: Although this case involves an ex parte reexamination, the principles here apply equally with ordinary ex parte examination. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 11:44 am
As part of an ex parte reexamination process, the Board of Patent Appeals (BPAI) found Antor's patent claims invalid as both anticipated and obvious based upon the combination of four prior art references. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 12:53 pm
The Board's recent decision in Ex parte Annakov is on point. [read post]
22 Oct 2024, 7:51 am
Ex parte Eidschun, Appeal 2023-003437 (PTAB Oct. 16, 2024). [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 11:01 am
” = = = Ex parte Mitchell, Appeal 2023-003309 (P.T.A.B. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 7:30 am
By Dennis Crouch Ex parte Gerlitz, APPEAL 2017-002398, 2018 WL 619852 (PTAB Jan. 26, 2018) GlucoVista’s patent application claims a method of determining glucose concentration in a body (i.e., physical matter) by changing the body’s surface temperature and measuring the change in infrared (IR) radiation emitted at the wavelength associated with Glucose IR emissions. [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 1:30 am
by Dennis Crouch Utility Doctrine does not get much use in patent prosecution. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 3:25 pm
" Ex Parte Maeng, 2011 WL 6012458 (BPAI November 30, 2011). [read post]
11 May 2016, 12:40 pm
Download it now: DTSA Mark-UP CROUCH We have covered the DTSA legislation and legislative process in several Patently-O Posts, including the following: Crouch, DTSA as a Shoe Horn for Contract and Employment Law Claims Crouch, Implementing and Interpreting the Defend Trade Secrets Act Crouch, Immediate Action for Human Resource Departments on the Defend Trade Secrets Act Crouch, White House on Non-Competes and Trade Secrets Crouch,… [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 6:54 pm
by Dennis Crouch Ariosa (Roche) v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 2:04 am
by Dennis Crouch Ex Parte Simons, APPEAL 2016-002684 (Patent Tr. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 11:28 am
Pop-Panels and Ex Parte Proceedings: The Supreme Court identified inter partes review as demanding a process for PTO Director Review. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:04 pm
Current inter partes reexamination fee is $8,800. $$$ Ex Parte Reexamination $$$: The AIA barely changes the ex parte reexamination process. [read post]
