Search for: "Ex Parte Edgar" Results 21 - 29 of 29
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Noel Semple
Is the HARM inflicted on the ex-spouse ethically irrelevant? [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 12:46 pm by John Floyd
Edgar Hoover directed against the late Dr. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:30 am by azatty
As someone once said to me, Richard hovers among us and among everyone who loves words, ready to offer insight like a deus ex machina. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:25 pm by Barry Sookman
On October 6, 2015 the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) released a bombshell, but not completely unexpected judgment, invalidating a decision of the European Commission that underpinned the EU-US privacy safe harbor. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 9:06 pm by Series of Essays
Disrupting Administrative Law in a Public Health Crisis April 24, 2020 | Andrew Edgar, University of Sydney Law School Parliamentary review and veto powers, the key controls on regulation-making, have been disabled. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:38 pm by rainey Reitman
Edgar Hoover or something, but as an adolescent I was in a way much more technical than I am now. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:02 am
Video game developers can’t do anything without getting sued these days—even when the opposing party is dead. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 12:00 am
Video game developers can’t do anything without getting sued these days—even when the opposing party is dead.In the latest video game right of publicity lawsuit, CMG Worldwide Inc. has filed a complaint against California based Maximum Games LLC, on behalf of General George Patton’s estate. [1] Maximum’s History, Legends of War: Patton is a turn-based game featuring the legendary World War II commander of the American Third and Seventh Armies. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 6:01 pm by MOTP
Aug. 23, 2007) (Fitzwater, J.)).IIIThe court begins with Moss's argument that it is entitled to summary judgment because Smith lacks Article III standing.AThe standing doctrine addresses the question of who may properly bring suit in federal court, and "is an essential and unchanging part of the case-or-controversy requirement of Article III. [read post]