Search for: "Ex Parte Elliott" Results 1 - 20 of 37
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2013, 12:55 am by 1 Crown Office Row
In R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex parte World Development Movement Ltd [1995] 1 WLR 386, for example, a highly-respected pressure group successfully challenged a government decision to commit very large amounts of money to an economically-flawed overseas development scheme. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:22 pm by Mark Bennett
From Ex Parte McCann, decided today by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals: Albert James Turner was charged with capital murder. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 2:51 am by Adam Wagner
As Lord Diplock (not a famous left winger) said in ex parte National Federation of Self Employed [1982] AC 617, 644 (quoted by Richard Edwards): ‘It would, in my view, be a grave lacuna in our system of public law if a pressure group like the federation, or even a single public-spirited taxpayer, were prevented by outdated technical rules of locus standi from bringing the matter to the attention of the court to vindicate the rule of law and get the… [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 10:47 am by Jeff Gamso
That's not the case with her ex-husband, Carl Elliott." [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 5:58 am by charonqc
The Guardian noted: “The judge said the argument that submitting an expenses form was part of the proceedings of parliament, and therefore protected by privilege, was akin to saying that the coin used in a slot machine was part of its machinery. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 8:27 am by pittsburghlawfirm
This will help teach your kids to be part of the collaboration between you and your ex. 6. [read post]
31 May 2018, 7:17 am by Maddie McMahon, Jack Goldsmith
He reasoned: It has been decided by the Supreme Court that the power ... conferred upon the President [by the Pardon Clause] is unlimited (ex parte Garland, 4 Wall., 333). [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 3:30 am by Adam Wagner
The appeal was of Mr Justice Saunders’ ruling in the Southwark Crown Court that the parliamentary privilege enshrined in the 1688 Bill of Rights does not extend to protecting the four ex-MPs, Elliott Morley, David Chaytor, James Devine and Lord Hanningfield, from prosecutions for claiming inflated expenses. [read post]
3 May 2016, 12:24 am by hannahlynes
The jury unanimously concluded that the behaviour of football supporters had in no part caused or contributed to the disaster. [read post]
3 May 2016, 12:24 am by hannahlynes
The jury unanimously concluded that the behaviour of football supporters had in no part caused or contributed to the disaster. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 3:35 am by Celia Rooney
  Dr Elliott thus concludes that the Court of Appeal has differed in its interpretation of UK law, but it has not defied Strasbourg. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 11:00 pm by Adam Wagner
This will not be the end of the affair, however, as leave to appeal has been granted with the case to be heard by the Court of Appeal as early as before the end of this month Mr Justice Saunders sitting the Southwark Crown Court ruled that the parliamentary privilege enshrined in the 1688 Bill of Rights does not extend to protecting the four ex-MPs, Elliott Morley, David Chaytor, James Devine and Lord Hanningfield, from prosecutions for claiming inflated expenses. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 7:36 am by Kelly Buchanan
Ex Parte McNiel, 80 U.S. 13 Wall. 236 (1871): the Court considered Roman law concerning the issue of pilotage. [read post]