Search for: "Ex Parte Favors"
Results 1 - 20
of 3,146
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2015, 4:00 pm
An Ex Parte Quayle Action can be favorable, because it means you are highly likely to obtain a patent. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 4:00 pm
An Ex Parte Quayle Action can be favorable, because it means you are highly likely to obtain a patent. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 4:00 pm
An Ex Parte Quayle Action can be favorable, because it means you are highly likely to obtain a patent. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 3:23 pm
(Ex parte Eileen C. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 6:01 am
The latest statistics on Ex Parte Reexamination (through December 2007) have been released by the PTO. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 2:00 pm
While inter partes review and post-grant review have been the favored proceedings over ex parte reexamination to challenge a patent's validity since the passage of the America Invents Act, ex parte reexamination has been increasing in popularity. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 4:20 am
On this date inter partes patent reexamination was discontinued in favor of the more robust Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceeding. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 5:46 am
In denying defendant's motion to stay pending ex parte reexamination, the court concluded that reexamination statistics weighed against a stay. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 3:10 am
That is to say, even when an ex parte patent reexamination is favorably concluded, the same challenger can simply refile a second request to take another shot at the patent. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 2:15 pm
While the DTSA has been on the books for over a year, relatively few courts have addressed the ex parte seizure provision and even fewer have actually granted a seizure under the DTSA. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 3:10 am
Still, not all ex parte reexaminations are involved in litigation. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 7:23 am
Shared Marketing and Ace filed a request for ex parte reexamination with the Patent Office arguing that certain prior art rendered each of the patents invalid. 92% of ex parte reexamination requests are granted, and this case was no exception. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 3:10 am
Estoppel of 35 USC § 317(b) Applies Only to Inter Partes Patent Reexamination One of the risks often associated with ex parte patent reexamination is that an outcome favorable to a patent holder is considered to “gold plate” a patent that is later asserted against the requester in district court, especially with respect to the same or similar art. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 12:48 pm
Whom Does the Balance of Convenience Favor? [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 5:48 am
Professor Kent will be guest-posting about the article, so the Readings post will be brief, but we wanted to flag this interesting and provocative analysis of Ex Parte Quirin. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 7:18 am
The court denied defendant's motion for summary judgment of no willful infringement of plaintiff's flush valve patent based on the PTO granting defendant's ex parte reexamination request. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 7:06 am
The wife filed for divorce and the parties separated pursuant to an ex parte restraining order issued against the husband. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 10:24 am
Rather, one Defendant has reached back in history to the non-binding "no risk for me" ex parte reexamination process, allowing all Defendant to lay behind the log, hoping for favorable developments with the passage of time. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 11:31 pm
Defendant's motion for a stay pending ex parte reexamination was denied. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 3:08 am
In Ex Parte Bilski, an en banc Federal Circuit plans to reconsider the scope of patentable subject matter as it relates to business methods and so called mental methods. [read post]
