Search for: "Ex Parte Garcia"
Results 161 - 175
of 175
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2008, 11:53 pm
Commissioner Garcia is spot on that the solutions lie in re-examining the process, not throwing more money at the problem.As long as Sheriff Thomas, Chuck Rosenthal, and Houston's current crop of ex-prosecutor judges runs the show, however, such a review would be pointless. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Quarterman, No. 07-70004 Denial of an application for a certificate of appealability following denial of habeas relief is affirmed in part, but reversed in part where, in light of the recent decision in Snyder v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 12:59 pm
Morton, 65 M.J. 91 (C.A.A.F. 2007) (mem.), Judge Erdmann dissented in part from the denial of the Garcia writ appeal. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
McBride, No. 06-7550 Denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus is affirmed in part where petitioner was not denied the effective assistance of counsel, but vacated where the state circuit court contravened his Sixth Amendment confrontation right by applying a per se rule restricting cross-examination of the prosecution's expert under a rape shield law. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Garcia, No. 07-40245 A conviction for drug-related offenses is reversed and remanded for a new trial where: 1) during rebuttal closing argument, the government improperly bolstered its key witnesses, the agents who heard defendant's unrecorded confession; and 2) such bolstering constituted reversible plain error, which seriously affected the fairness, integrity, and public reputation of the proceedings. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
" U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, February 05, 2008 Garcia-Meza v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Sexton, No. 05-6412, 05-6415, 05-6416 Defendants' sentences for offenses stemming from the distribution of cocaine, imposed on a remand pursuant to Booker, are affirmed over meritless claims that: 1) the district court violated their Sixth Amendment and due process rights by using its own factual findings to calculate their sentencing ranges under the Guidelines; 2) the sentences exceeded the "maximum statutory sentence" allowable for their offenses; 3) imposition of their sentences… [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 7:43 pm
The parts about Bernie begin on page 17. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
Garcia-Lara
• Williams v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 5:39 pm
These scandals are in part replications of inmate abuse inside of America's domestic prison gulag. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 3:04 am
Garcia, in Capitol v. [read post]
16 Jun 2007, 7:16 pm
These scandals are in part replications of inmate abuse inside of America's domestic prison gulag. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 4:04 am
Does 1-16, 07-485 (WJ/LFG), involving the University of New Mexico, where Magistrate Judge Garcia ruled that the motion should be made on notice rather than ex parte. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 9:23 am
That deal is attractive from the ex ante perspective to any sane person . . . . [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
Does 1-16, was denied on the ground that there was no lawful rationale for proceeding ex parte, rather than on notice to (a) the students, and (b) the university.Legal challenges to ex parte discovery procedure.The ex parte discovery process is being challenged in the Boston University case, in Boston, Massachusetts, where a motion to quash and vacate has been made in Arista v. [read post]
