Search for: "Ex Parte Giles"
Results 21 - 40
of 65
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2017, 1:59 pm
(At 27 & 28): Mr Hutchings submitted that it was the settled understanding amongst practitioners that acceptance of an offer of temporary accommodation falling within subsection (5) of the 1996 Act never discharges the full housing duty, and drew my attention to the judgment of Lewis J in R (Brooks) v Islington London Borough Council [2016] PTSR 389 at [41] and that of Moses J in R v Brent London Borough Council ex parte Sadiq (2001) 33 HLR at [36]. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 2:52 pm
A similar argument was rejected by the House of Lords in R v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, ex p. [read post]
24 May 2016, 4:02 pm
Mr Butt had been a material witness as had Mr Court, Mrs Court’s ex-husband. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 12:56 pm
The post Floating rights by Giles Peaker appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 2:05 pm
The correct approach to that duty is set by the Court of Appeal in decisions such as R v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea ex p. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:02 am
McKenna: that would be part of the cost. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 12:49 pm
After a lengthy trek through Bubb, Puhlhofer, Cocks v Thanet District Council [1983] 2 AC 286, Ferdous Begum and R v Northavon District Council ex parte Palmer (1994) 26 HLR 572, the court concluded that Wednesbury was the appropriate test and further that “the range of rational decisions” was not so narrow as to determine the outcome. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 12:33 pm
They were charged with colluding with ex-CFO Andy Fastow and his lieutenant Michael Kopper of stealing money from their former employer Greenwich NatWest (now part of RBS). [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 1:41 pm
The Three — who were charged with colluding with ex-Enron CFO Andy Fastow and his lieutenant Michael Kopper to steal money from their former employer, Greenwich NatWest, now part of RBS — changed their plea from not-guilty to guilty back in November. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Giles. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 11:28 am
” The Court reminded itself of the high threshold for a mandatory, rather than prohibitory injunction, of a ‘strong prima facie case’, via Francis V Kensington and Chelsea Royal London Borough Council [2003] 1 WLR 2248, then went on to the criteria for the exercise of the discretion to accommodate pending appeal in R v Camden London Borough Council ex parte Mohammed [1997] 30 HLR 315. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
From July 2012 Ms Cotton received child benefit for her daughter, while her ex-husband received child benefit for her son. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
Perhaps Lord Sumption has developed a taste for ex tempore extra-judicial statements of a general nature? [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
And, the USPTO may have been savvy before Ex Parte Lundgren.Unfortunately, business method patents still appear to be troublesome even after the establishment of a prior user defense for business methods, the Alice case, and the recent America Invents Act broadly applicable prior user defense. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am
Lack of resources or available accommodation on the Council’s part, “cannot in any way affect whether an applicant is in priority need”. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 2:06 pm
This is potentially huge. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
Giles, slave-economy profits provided the source of many well-known fortunes: Aetna Insurance Co., E.I. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 1:47 pm
Por su parte, la licenciada Cruz Niemiec es abogada litigante con amplia experiencia en diversas áreas del Derecho. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 4:18 pm
On the cases: Mr P’s s.202 decision read, in part: “Applying the vulnerability test and taking into account the information in front of me, I am satisfied that your circumstances are not such for me to conclude that you are vulnerable. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 5:11 pm
Giles v. [read post]
