Search for: "Ex Parte Griffin" Results 61 - 68 of 68
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
"[E]x parte interviews with a party-patient's health-care providers by opponent's counsel impermissibly compromise[] the physician-patient privilege. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
McBride, No. 06-7550 Denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus is affirmed in part where petitioner was not denied the effective assistance of counsel, but vacated where the state circuit court contravened his Sixth Amendment confrontation right by applying a per se rule restricting cross-examination of the prosecution's expert under a rape shield law. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Gray, No. 05-4482, 06-3086, 06-3209 Defendants' convictions for various offenses convictions, which stemmed from their alleged schemes to procure government contracts for corporate clients and financial gains for themselves by illicitly providing money and gifts to public officials in exchange for political influence in the bid for municipal contracts, are affirmed in part and reversed in part where: 1) the district court did not err in concluding that various purported… [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
County of Allegheny, No. 06-2869 "In an action against various defendants for violations of 42 U.S.C. section 1983 and state law, arising from a former 911 dispatcher's improper use of his job facilities to track down and kill his ex-girlfriend and her boyfriend, plaintiff's son, dismissal of the claims is reversed in part and the matter remanded with instructions to permit plaintiff an opportunity to amend certain state-created danger and equal protection claims, as… [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 6:49 am
"Mason was overruled in part by State v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 5:00 am
Such as: Some former staffers really, really don't want their ex-boss to advance to the mayor's office. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 10:56 am
That last part seems difficult to buy.First of all, we have ex-COS to the AG Kyle Sampson's email clearly advocating use of the 2006 amendment to 28 U.S.C. [read post]