Search for: "Ex Parte Griffith"
Results 41 - 60
of 66
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2012, 12:04 pm
Ex. 16, Decl. of Charles A. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm
The defamation case of Jooste v GMC was heard on 26 June 2012 and an ex tempore judgment given. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 12:23 pm
Morrissette gets calls all the time: part of our mission to help others engage in fair use. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 9:07 am
Read Ben’s analysis of Judge Griffith’s opinion here and Wells’ oral argument recap here. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:38 pm
Verizon's attendance policy was part of a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:20 am
Sullivan parries, by reminding Griffith of Walton’s unqualified conclusion that Suleiman was simply “part of” the Taliban. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-5163 September 13, 2011 Judge: Griffith Areas of Law: Government & Administrative Law, Health Law, Public Benefits In a 2008 administrative appeal, the Secretary of Health and Human Services ruled that a Medicare beneficiary enrolled in Medicare Part C still qualified as a person "entitled to benefits" under Medicare Part A. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 11:53 am
More probably, Walton suggested, the Taliban tolerated Suleiman’s two visits because Suleiman was actually “part of” the Taliban. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:13 pm
In two of them, the issue went to appeal and the BPAI reversed (Ex parte Mitchell and Ex parte Griffith). [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
See Ex parte Chevron Chemical Co., 720 So.2d 922, 928 n.6 (Ala. 1998). [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 11:18 am
Two ex-employees approached the press with four documents taken from Lion Laboratories. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Judge Garland was also part of a unanimous panel that upheld a Park Service regulation; the Supreme Court subsequently vacated the ruling on the ground that the suit was not ripe. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:47 pm
(Ex parte Flynn.) [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 11:10 am
And the exclusionary rule for changing law on direct appeal provides the critical incentive ex ante: The exclusionary rule gives criminal defendants an incentive to ask for changes in the law because it creates a possibility they might benefit from those changes. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case – Owen Dean’s response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 – Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal Administrative Court… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case - Owen Dean's response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 - Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal Administrative Court finds PARK AVENUE not descriptive for publications (Class 46)… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case - Owen Dean's response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 - Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal Administrative Court finds PARK AVENUE not descriptive for publications (Class 46)… [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 7:53 am
Leifur and his attorney, Michael Griffith, did not comment as they left the Santa Rosa County Courthouse.According to arrest papers, Leifur pulled the woman over in April 2007 on suspicion of drunken driving. [read post]
7 May 2008, 6:03 am
Profit Concepts was a California corporation with an ex-employee, Griffith, residing in Oklahoma. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Griffith, No. 07-50531 Defendants' sentences imposed on remand for their participation in a conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine are affirmed where: 1) under the mandate rule, defendants waived various objections regarding certain defendants' requests for a decrease for minimal or minor participant; 2) the district court erroneously concluded that the mandate rule precluded other defendants from raising objections to their conspiracy sentences for minor or minimal… [read post]
