Search for: "Ex Parte Henderson" Results 1 - 20 of 67
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2012, 9:32 am by Steve Hall
The Court of Criminal Appeals ruling in Ex Parte Henderson is available in Adobe .pdf format, as are concurring and dissenting opinons. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 6:04 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2007) (“[O]bvious variants of prior art references are themselves part of the public domain.”). see IPBiz post Kimberly-Clark v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 1:59 pm
Erika Harmon Arner of Finnegan Henderson has a nice summary, including the precise issues involved, of what is involved in the upcoming Federal Circuit hearing en banc in Ex parte Bilski and the patentability of business methods.For background, seePatently-OPATENTly - unOBVIOUSPatent ProspectorPeter Zura's 271 Patent BlogAnticipate This! [read post]
25 Mar 2017, 8:27 pm by Patent Docs
Murphy, Ph.D., of Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner will provide guidance to patent counsel on Markush claims in the prosecution and litigation of patents, review the original case, Ex Parte Markush, and other key cases, and discuss the ongoing... [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 7:29 am by Wells Bennett
Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:08 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
The case is notable both for a) the quick turnaround and b) the lack of dissent among a court that was divided 5-4 on similar questions in Ex Parte Robbins, Overton and Henderson. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 10:24 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
McCelland & Stewart Ltd., and Henderson v. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 8:50 pm by Patent Docs
The Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO) will offer a one-hour webinar entitled "Ex Parte Schulhauser and Claim Drafting for Computer-Implemented Inventions" on March 1, 2017 from 2:00 to 3:00 pm (ET). [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 5:18 pm by Dennis Crouch
Professor Barton Beebe (NYU) (trademark depletion; 2/3 of recent registrations from China on apparel include fraudulent specimens; supporting ex parte reexamination of registered marks and expungement); Douglas Rettew (Finnegan Henderson) (arguing that eBay should not apply in trademark cases, but rather that mark holders should have a presumption of injunction) Megan Bannigan (Debevoise & Plimpton) (clutter due to fraudulent registration and renewal Prof. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 7:46 am by Wells Bennett
 Today, a three-judge panel affirmed the district court’s rejection of the ex-detainee’s suit against government officials: KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge: As part of its global war on terrorism, the United States detained Abdul Rahim Abdul Razak al Janko in Afghanistan and at United States Naval Station Guantanamo Bay (Guantanamo) in Cuba for seven years before the district court granted him a writ of habeas corpus and ordered that diplomatic… [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 5:19 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The Court held that “the EEOC can contact former managers ex parte for the purposes of this administrative investigation, prior to the potential commencement of a lawsuit” and granted the EEOC’s motion to enforce the subpoena. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 12:05 pm
Some law firms might do it for big institutional clients, in part to win new business, he said. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 9:09 am by Zoe Bedell
The court relied primarily on the Supreme Court’s 1942 decision in Ex Parte Quirin, where the Court addressed the contours of the Article III exception for law-of-war military commissions. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm by Peter Margulies
The Supreme Court said in 1942’s Ex Parte Quirin (the Nazi saboteurs case) that a military commission could try defendants for violations of the law of war, which the Court depicted as predominantly, if not exclusively, international in nature. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 7:17 am by Gritsforbreakfast
As I wrote in 2013 legislative testimony in my role as Policy Director for the Innocence Project of Texas: The issue [also] came up in Ex Parte Henderson (2012), [in which] five judges agreed to grant Cathy Lynn Henderson a new trial in a per curiam opinion, but no single interpretation of the law could gain more than four votes on the court, meaning at present there is no clear, agreed upon theory regarding how and why relief may be granted. [read post]