Search for: "Ex Parte Little" Results 1 - 20 of 3,414
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2009, 6:48 pm
Here's the abstract:Ex parte Young is a central part of the federal courts canon, yet the underlying historical details are little known or understood. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 5:00 am by ipelton
The post TTAB refuses registration of LITTLE MERMAID for dolls as descriptive in precedential opinion on Ex Parte Appeal appeared first on Erik M Pelton & Associates, PLLC - The Nontraditional Trademark Lawyers®. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 8:11 pm by Karen G. Hazzah
Ex parte Rodriguez (precedential)Decided October 1, 2009 (Appeal 2008-000693, Appl. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 9:57 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
From the BPAI decision Ex Parte Brochu -->** Of "broadest reasonable interpretation" [BRI]:-->During examination of a patent application, pending claims are given theirbroadest reasonable construction consistent with the specification. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 2:52 pm
Note that Ex parte Golovinsky is in the same technology center as Ex parte Jerding! [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:15 am by Dennis Crouch
  Ex parte appeals are no different. [read post]
19 May 2010, 11:49 pm by Steve Vladeck
More than just a problematic application of Ex parte Young, though, such analysis could also open the door for courts to identify additional previously unrecognized requirements for Young actions. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 6:43 pm
Did PTO contact you for assistance or information to help them estimate the burden associated with the Ex parte Appeal Rule? [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:49 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See Answer 16; See Ex parte Nehls, 88 USPQ2d 1883, 1887-90 (BPAI 2008) (precedential); Ex parte Curry, 84 USPQ2d 1272 (BPAI 2005) (informative) (Federal Circuit Appeal No. 2006-1003, aff’d, Rule 36 (June 12, 2006)); Ex parte Mathias, 84 USPQ2d 1276 (BPAI 2005) (informative), aff’d, 191 Fed. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 7:15 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Many cases are cited in the Board's affirmance in Ex parte Karr:If a prima facie case of obviousness is established, the burden shifts to the applicant to come forward with arguments and/or evidence to rebut the prima facie case. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
While there is little incentive for delay in application prosecution once reaching the Examiner Answer phase, such is not always the case for ex parte patent reexamination. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 10:11 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The bottom line in Ex parte Barber:The Examiner did not err in rejecting claims 1, 3-7, 9-21, 23-41, 63-68, 70, and 71 under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 12:18 pm
 Plaintiffs' counsel may then use the information learned from the ex parte contacts to tailor deposition questioning. [read post]
28 May 2008, 12:25 pm
Give the reusable items to charity, take the junk to the dump, and stash the things you can't part with (e.g. your diamond engagement ring). 3. [read post]