Search for: "Ex Parte May"
Results 101 - 120
of 12,788
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2023, 2:00 pm
The post Will My Ex Get Any Part of My Military Pension? [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 5:43 pm
Informative Decision Led to Confusion Last month the Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) designated Ex Parte Jung 2016-008290, “informative. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 2:50 am
(That is, when you appear in an adversarial hearing you may be able to tell just your side of the story, but in ex parte hearings, there is a much broader duty to disclose.) [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 7:25 am
If you divorced your narcissistic ex in part because of their abusive behaviour towards you, you have no obligation to tolerate it in divorce. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 7:25 am
If you divorced your narcissistic ex in part because of their abusive behaviour towards you, you have no obligation to tolerate it in divorce. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
And “[h]owever well-intended the emergency hotline may be,” the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to “entertain ex parte oral requests” from hospital employees. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
And “[h]owever well-intended the emergency hotline may be,” the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to “entertain ex parte oral requests” from hospital employees. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 11:23 am
There are currently ten (10) appeals pending before the CAFC from TTAB decisions in ex parte cases. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 3:07 am
Ex parte NicolThe Examiner looks to a reference for all that it teaches and does not limit a reference to its preferred embodiments. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 6:57 am
From Ex parte BarrOf written descriptionWe agree with the Examiner, and further find that the meaning of oneof the limitations of the claims cannot be determined from the Specificationand drawings. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 10:26 am
From Ex parte STRZALKOWSKIOf obviousnessAs we noted in our Opinion, "[I]t is not necessary that the references be physically combinable to render obvious the invention under review." [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 6:02 am
Ex parte NagyAs to an apparatus claimAppellants have not shown by persuasive technical reasoning or credibleevidence that the structure set out in Fig. 1 and 2 of Braun does not perform(or is not capable of performing) the recited functions in Appellants’ claimsas explained by the Examiner (id.). [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 4:15 am
§ 1836(b)(2), authorizes a federal court to issue an order, in extraordinary circumstances, and upon an ex parte application based on an affidavit or verified complaint, to provide for seizure of property necessary to preserve evidence or to prevent the propagation or dissemination of the trade secret. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 3:43 am
Ex Parte interviews of Non-party doctors is the subject of todays Court of Appeals Ruling. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:12 am
Ex parte Levy, 17 USPQ2d 1461, 1464 (Bd. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 6:37 am
The Court of Appeals orders a new trial for two people accused of marriage fraud because the trial judge had an ex parte conversation with the jurors and may have compromised the integrity of the jury process by undermining the presumption of innocence.The case is U.S. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 7:56 am
A new opinion from the District of Columbia Bar Legal Ethics Committee: The principal question presented is whether a lawyer may ask his or her client’s treating physician not to have ex parte communications with opposing counsel in a medical... [read post]
25 Dec 2014, 4:05 am
In Ex parte Kogan, the Examiner relied upon a figure to justify a 102(e) rejection; this was overturned by PTAB: We note that Appellants' specification differentiates between contact or group names and attributes.Supra. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 3:04 pm
The district court began its analysis of the ex parte application by noting that ex parte applications are solely for extraordinary relief and should be used with discretion. [read post]
29 May 2020, 4:53 am
Here are three ex parte appeals decided yesterday by the Board: a Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion case, a Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusal, and a Section 2(e)(4) surname ruling. [read post]
