Search for: "Ex Parte McClelland" Results 1 - 12 of 12
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2011, 9:20 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Although the low profile "ex parte" re-examination stays the same, procedures above ex parte but short of litigation change. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 3:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
Ct. 3218 (2010); Ex parte Translogic Tech., Inc., Appeal 2005-1050, Reexamination Control Nos. 90/006,392 et al. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 1:18 am by Dennis Crouch
This standard also applies to, and is borrowed from, ex parte patent prosecution, and is notably distinct from the analysis done in the district court which considers the earlier prosecution (intrinsic) record for guidance as to claim meaning. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
He also compared Reexamination standards versus Litigation standards, and explained the process of litigating validity at the USPTO via ex parte patent reexamination, inter partes review, and post-grant review. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
He also compared Reexamination standards versus Litigation standards, and explained the process of litigating validity at the USPTO via ex parte patent reexamination, inter partes review, and post-grant review. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 2:14 am by R. David Donoghue
In 2005, the USPTO established the Central Reexamination Unit (CRU) to exclusively handle all reexaminations, whether ex parte or inter partes within the Office. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 3:04 pm by Bexis
Echeverria, 744 P.2d 960, 965 (Okla. 1987); see also State ex rel. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The statements were filed as part of a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of a new state law limiting release of the governor’s travel records. [read post]