Search for: "Ex Parte Parker"
Results 101 - 120
of 130
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2010, 2:51 pm
[part of a heat map of gene expression values; from Wikimedia] In Ex parte Kelkar, claims were directed to a method for determining similarity between portions of gene expression profiles or genes (independent claim 1) and a program product having computer readable code stored on a recordable media for determining similarity between portions of gene expression profiles or genes (independent claim 10). [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 9:44 pm
After NMCCA ordered a DuBay hearing arising from the military judge’s alleged ex parte communications with a government witness from the Parker DuBay hearing, Code 46 filed a petition for extraordinary relief with CAAF, who ordered the proceedings stayed. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 11:47 am
CAAF today stayed NMCCA’s order for a DuBay hearing to explore alleged ex parte communications affecting a previous DuBay hearing in the capital Parker case. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 7:31 pm
Parker. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 12:49 pm
Ex parte Bilski, No. 2002-2257, 2006 Pat. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 9:31 am
Among his concerns - "changes that we believe would permit unreasonable fees and expenses, reduce client confidentialty protections, and permit ex-parte agency contacts." [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 10:24 pm
It isn't fun for anyone. " Lisa Parker was a debt collector for five years and says there was a lot of pressure to collect debts, by any means necessary, to keep the job. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 9:59 am
Other defendants named in the case are New York search firms Kagan Consultants Inc. and Parker Leland Inc. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Parker v. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 9:21 pm
There was the lawmiss business, but there was also her ex parte communication about the case with Judge McGinty. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:48 am
Supp. 740, 781 (E.D.N.Y.1984), aff’d in pertinent part, 818 F.2d 145 (2d Cir.1987). [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 4:30 am
There is a seemingly ex parte meeting with a judge. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 10:45 am
BANKERS – THE ONLY PEOPLE JESUS EVER SHOUTED AT The Fuckpig is part of a series of paintings I did over Christmas to amuse myself and have a mild dig at the pretentious nature of some modern art. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 10:00 pm
Parker v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 2:28 am
But he said the husband's claim that his former wife's share in an Irish company should also be part of the marriage assets failed because any return was likely to be 'very much in the future'. [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:48 am
Apr. 28, 2009)(Unpub)Affirming dismissal of Black fem's race-based training, discipline and termination claims5th CircuitØ Parker v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 2:04 am
A4393
Weinstein -- Makes a technical correction to chapter 326 of the laws of 2008, for the expiration of family courts to hear certain ex parte applications for orders of protection Same as S 2353 BLURB : Ord. of protect: family court Last Act: 04/21/09 signed chap.17A5710
Gottfried (MS) -- Prohibits discrimination based on gender identity or expression and includes offenses regarding gender identity or expression under the hate crimes… [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 12:31 am
S2167
PARKER -- Enacts the "Clear Your Good Name Act"; requires all state and municipal law enforcement agencies to expunge references to and records of voidable arrests Same as A 3350 BLURB : CP L. expunge voidable arrests Last Act: 02/12/09 REFERRED TO CODESLast Action Date: 02/13/09(Results Count = ) Bill No. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, December 15, 2008 US v Haygood, No. 07-1771 A guilty plea conviction and sentence relating to defendant's possession of marijuana and firearms that police found in his home during the execution of a search warrant is affirmed in part as to the conviction, but the sentence is vacated and remanded where the district court erred when defendant was deprived of the right of allocution at sentencing. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 7:06 pm
It's such a pervasive phenomenon that it's probably inherent in any situation where the government isn't actually doing the enforcing.We'd much prefer to cut off problems with non-parallel "parallel requirements" at the source, by reading §337(a) to preclude, in the first instance, anybody else from intruding upon what the Supreme Court described in Buckman as the FDA's "exclusive" enforcement authority. 531 U.S. at 352.But we can't help… [read post]
