Search for: "Ex Parte Patterson" Results 1 - 20 of 72
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am by Eugene Volokh
[Or for that matter to women, to unmarried women, or to women based on age, race, national origin, religion, citizenship (other-"natural-born" or otherwise), and the like?] [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The moves are part of the Biden administration’s push to demonstrate it is on guard amid new voting restrictions proposed and enacted by GOP-led states across the nation, and as Democratic-led federal voting legislation has stalled. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 8:26 am by Eugene Volokh
Nye (Stagnaro, Saba & Patterson), the UCLA First Amendment Clinic had filed an amicus brief supporting that position and arguing that the court should hear the case, on behalf of Profs. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
The order is properly seen as a preliminary injunction because it was not granted ex parte, cf. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 11:30 am by John Elwood
That’s because we have the better part of a month with only one set of relists. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm by admin
Midkiff,14 the state legislation allowed for a forced transfer of title to real property from lessors to lessees as part of a program to abolish the remnants of a Polynesian feudal land tenure system. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm by admin
Midkiff,14 the state legislation allowed for a forced transfer of title to real property from lessors to lessees as part of a program to abolish the remnants of a Polynesian feudal land tenure system. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 11:48 am by Jason Rantanen
”  Yet 101 is controversial – the rate of ex parte decisions addressing 101 has also shot up, from less than 10% to over 80% in 2018 in medical diagnostic and software technology areas, and to 26% overall. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
Dept. of Commerce,  Case 1:18-cv-02921 (SDNY,  Filed 15 January 2019), a federal district court determined that the Secretary of Commerce unlawfully exercised what discretionary authority the law allowed in the ways he went about directing the insertion of the citizenship question that unlawfully annoyed some stakeholders and threatened others, in part because the decision was not  "reasonable and reasonably explained. [read post]