Search for: "Ex Parte Quirin" Results 1 - 20 of 121
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2013, 5:48 am by Kenneth Anderson
Professor Kent will be guest-posting about the article, so the Readings post will be brief, but we wanted to flag this interesting and provocative analysis of Ex Parte Quirin. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 6:02 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Davies (George Mason University School of Law) has posted Some Clerical Contributions to Ex Parte Quirin (Green Bag 2d, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 283-325 (2016)) on SSRN. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 6:33 am by Dan Ernst
Andrew Kent, Fordham University School of Law, has posted Judicial Review for Enemy Fighters: The Court's Fateful Turn in Ex Parte Quirin, the Nazi Saboteur Case, which will appear in Vanderbilt Law Review 66 (2013); 101. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 8:00 am by Benjamin Wittes
Andrew Kent writes in with the following guest post on his fascinating new article on Ex Parte Quirin. [read post]
3 May 2022, 8:49 am by Josh Blackman
Ex Parte Quirin considered the validity of a military prosecutions against eight Nazi saboteurs (one of whom was a U.S. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
7/29/1942: Supreme Court hears oral argument in Ex Parte Quirin. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
7/29/1942: Supreme Court hears oral argument in Ex Parte Quirin. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
10/29/1942: Published decision in Ex Parte Quirin released. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
10/29/1942: Published decision in Ex Parte Quirin released. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
10/29/1942: Published decision in Ex Parte Quirin released. [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of these trials in Ex Parte Quirin. [read post]
1 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of these trials in Ex Parte Quirin. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  This article introduces some documents relating to Ex parte Quirin and then explains where they have been for the last 70-plus years. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 4:24 pm by Wells Bennett
In this little read-out, I’ll make this lone observation (one I see Steve also mentioned too, over at Just Security): with his questions to both parties today, Judge David Tatel demonstrated keen sensitivity to a key precedent, Ex Parte Quirin. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 6:33 am by Peter Margulies
  The Court’s landmark decision in Ex Parte Milligan dovetails with Quirin. [read post]
31 May 2017, 9:09 am by Robert Chesney, Steve Vladeck
 The explain what that label does and does not refer to, survey the pre-9/11 history (with an emphasis on key Supreme Court decisions like Ex parte Milligan and Ex parte Quirin), identify the key issues raised by the military commission system established after 9/11, track how those issues evolved over time (as the executive branch tinkered with the rules, as the courts weighed in, and as Congress ultimately intervened in 2006 and… [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 5:41 am by Steve Vladeck
See, e.g., Ex parte Quirin, 317 U.S. 1 (1942) (holding that law-of-war military commission convened July 8, 1942 at Washington, D.C. had jurisdiction to try Richard Quirin and seven others); Sec’y of War Henry L. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 5:41 am by Steve Vladeck
  See, e.g., Ex parte Quirin, 317 U.S. 1 (1942) (holding that law-of-war military commission convened July 8, 1942 at Washington, D.C. had jurisdiction to try Richard Quirin and seven others); Sec’y of War Henry L. [read post]