Search for: "Ex Parte Smith" Results 181 - 200 of 1,183
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2011, 8:00 am by Alex Gude
Smith did not inspect a defective part because he was not in the factory on the date that he claims he was). [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 7:51 am by Adam Faderewski
Ex officio members include Bill Kroger and Mindy Davidson. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 2:21 am by INFORRM
Cross-border liability and jurisdiction Ilsjan (Case C-194/16) is another CJEU reference on the Article 7(2) (ex-Art 5(3)) tort jurisdiction provisions of the EU Jurisdiction Regulation. [read post]
31 May 2019, 2:37 pm by ccollins
As part of the plea deal, the other charges were dropped. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 8:57 am
Did the Ninth Circuit err in holding that Smith v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 1:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
As to patent reissue, the CAFC has clarified the scope of error necessary for patent reissue (Ex Parte Tanaka) and has addressed the complexities of the recapture doctrine (Ex Parte Mostafazadeh). [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Cross-border liability and jurisdiction Ilsjan (Case C-194/16) is another CJEU reference on the Article 7(2) (ex-Art 5(3)) tort jurisdiction provisions of the EU Jurisdiction Regulation. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 6:25 pm by Scott McKeown
., the Federal Circuit tackled the question of whether a post-issuance review proceeding (in this case, ex parte reexamination (“EPR”)) was available to a challenger that repeatedly filed another post-issuance review proceeding (in this case, inter partes review (“IPR”)) to forward the very same argument. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 2:54 am
The BPAI reports that in the period of Sept-Dec 2008, it received an average of 954 ex parte appeal cases per month. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm
Recognizing the need for an expedited, low-cost alternative to patent litigations for reviewing certain aspects of patent validity, Congress introduced various patent challenging mechanisms at the USPTO over the years, from ex parte reexamination and the short-lived inter partes reexamination (IPRex) to the new inter partes review (IPR) and post-grant review (PGR) proceedings enacted with Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:43 pm by Brett Trout
” This is a higher standard than the ex parte “substantial new question of patentability. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 8:39 am
Another benefit of combining forces may be for the group (if regulatory burdens became overwhelming) to employ a part time ex-solicitor working from home to develop expertise in money laundering, SRA rules etc. [read post]