Search for: "Ex Parte Smith" Results 161 - 180 of 1,094
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2020, 2:09 pm by Shea Denning
See, e.g, Ex parte Jackson, 96 U.S. 727, 733 (1878) (noting that while a letter is in the mail, the police may not intercept it and examine its contents unless they first obtain a warrant based on probable cause); United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 6:01 pm by MOTP
Aug. 23, 2007) (Fitzwater, J.)).IIIThe court begins with Moss's argument that it is entitled to summary judgment because Smith lacks Article III standing.AThe standing doctrine addresses the question of who may properly bring suit in federal court, and "is an essential and unchanging part of the case-or-controversy requirement of Article III. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 2:34 pm
In 1980, Congress established “ex parte reexamination,” which still exists today. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 1:27 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The Ex Post Facto Clause of the Constitution of the United States provides, in relevant part, that "no ex post facto law shall be passed. [read post]
4 May 2011, 8:00 am by Alex Gude
Smith did not inspect a defective part because he was not in the factory on the date that he claims he was). [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 2:21 am by INFORRM
Cross-border liability and jurisdiction Ilsjan (Case C-194/16) is another CJEU reference on the Article 7(2) (ex-Art 5(3)) tort jurisdiction provisions of the EU Jurisdiction Regulation. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 8:57 am
Did the Ninth Circuit err in holding that Smith v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 2:37 pm by ccollins
As part of the plea deal, the other charges were dropped. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 1:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
As to patent reissue, the CAFC has clarified the scope of error necessary for patent reissue (Ex Parte Tanaka) and has addressed the complexities of the recapture doctrine (Ex Parte Mostafazadeh). [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 6:25 pm by Scott McKeown
., the Federal Circuit tackled the question of whether a post-issuance review proceeding (in this case, ex parte reexamination (“EPR”)) was available to a challenger that repeatedly filed another post-issuance review proceeding (in this case, inter partes review (“IPR”)) to forward the very same argument. [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Cross-border liability and jurisdiction Ilsjan (Case C-194/16) is another CJEU reference on the Article 7(2) (ex-Art 5(3)) tort jurisdiction provisions of the EU Jurisdiction Regulation. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm
Recognizing the need for an expedited, low-cost alternative to patent litigations for reviewing certain aspects of patent validity, Congress introduced various patent challenging mechanisms at the USPTO over the years, from ex parte reexamination and the short-lived inter partes reexamination (IPRex) to the new inter partes review (IPR) and post-grant review (PGR) proceedings enacted with Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 2:54 am
The BPAI reports that in the period of Sept-Dec 2008, it received an average of 954 ex parte appeal cases per month. [read post]