Search for: "Ex Parte State Ex Rel. Attorney General"
Results 281 - 300
of 690
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
” (Id. at p. 397; see People ex rel. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 7:13 pm
" (Ex parte Gehring, PTAB 2016.)Details:Ex parte GehringAppeal 2014004556; Appl. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
Alabama ex. rel. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
Which is merely part and parcel of the larger public policy question. [read post]
28 May 2015, 9:00 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 1:15 pm
OVDP-Generally. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 6:54 am
The qui tam case is captioned U.S. ex rel. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 7:04 am
” People ex Rel. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
The Court of Appeals decision reads, in part: "Until today, the interplay between Public Officers Law � 43 and article IV, � 6 of the Constitution presented an open legal question ... [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Attorney in the Southern District of New York (1983-1987) and Inspector General of the Justice Department (1994-1999). [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 5:39 am
Six state attorneys general reportedly have been meeting to discuss what legal actions are possible to stop changes at the postal system that will hinder timely delivery of absentee and mail-in ballots in the general election. [read post]
31 Jan 2025, 11:35 am
See also A.M. ex rel. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 2:15 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 2:23 pm
These strategies may be invoked successfully at least in part, but the strategic tools are available to all parties and it is not clear how the landscape of the legal battlefields will be shaped nor the course of combat within the courts. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 10:58 am
Ohio, ex rel. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 2:40 pm
State ex rel. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
Ex parte United States, 242 U.S. 27, 37 S.Ct. 72, 61 L.Ed. 129 (1916). [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 11:22 am
Alabama ex rel. [read post]
8 Nov 2024, 9:28 am
PART I. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am
(Docket Report) District Court N D California: False advertisement through third parties may constitute false marking, but facts must be pled with particularity: United States of America, ex. rel., et. al. v. [read post]