Search for: "Ex Parte Strickland"
Results 1 - 20
of 68
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2024, 6:43 am
Judge Murphy concurred in part and dissented in part by separate opinion, and would have held that the indictment for habitual misdemeanor assault in (3) was insufficient as physical injury and serious injury were not synonymous. (1) Out-of-court statements were corroborative and not hearsay; (2) closing argument statements were not improper vouching for victim’s credibility; (3) during bench trial, trial court is presumed to ignore inadmissible evidence unless evidence is… [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 12:44 pm
¶ 5–7 & Exs. [read post]
6 May 2022, 7:04 am
This post summarizes published criminal law decisions from the Court of Appeals of North Carolina released on May 3, 2022. [read post]
18 May 2021, 4:28 pm
A unanimous Fourth Circuit vacated in part and remanded. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 5:48 am
The defendant was convicted of accessory after the fact to a felony and felony obstruction of justice in Cleveland County relating to her efforts to assist a murder suspect (later convicted of second-degree murder) evade capture. (1) The defendant argued the statutory offense of accessory after the fact abrogated the common law offense of obstruction of justice in part, such that she could not be convicted of both. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 11:30 am
That’s because we have the better part of a month with only one set of relists. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 7:40 am
Alabama ex rel. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am
Alabama ex rel. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 2:30 pm
Under Strickland v. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 4:47 pm
Recently I presented at the seventh annual Family Law Forum run by Legalwise in Brisbane about third party property settlement issues. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 11:54 am
Strickland. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
Upton); ex post facto clause challenges ( Trotter v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 8:30 am
State ex rel. [read post]
29 May 2016, 5:20 am
” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 688. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that, in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board may construe claims in an issued patent according to their broadest reasonable interpretation rather than their plain and ordinary meaning; and (2) whether the court of appeals erred in holding that, even if the Board exceeds its statutory authority in instituting an IPR proceeding, the Board’s decision whether to institute an IPR proceeding is judicially… [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 8:28 am
Nevertheless, the court found no Strickland prejudice at the guilt phase. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 8:38 am
The original rule of Ex parte Watkins was that the judgment of the criminal court, if not reversed on appeal by a court with jurisdiction to do so, was absolutely conclusive. [read post]
