Search for: "Ex Parte Tate" Results 1 - 20 of 38
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2009, 4:09 pm
Tate, 64 M.J. 269 (C.A.A.F. 2007), which had a similar, though not identical, waiver of NMCPB rights. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 6:42 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” See, e.g., Tate Access Floors, Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 5:39 pm
The complaint alleges, in part, discrimination based on age, race, disability, gender and, in the case of one ex-employee, sexual orientation. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 7:12 am by Jim Sedor
Tate’s Supporters Lobbied in Front of His Committee, Gave to His Campaign by Ashley Jefcoat for KUNC Missouri: Lobbyist Play Part, Spend Cash in Jefferson City by Jason Hunsicker for Kirksville Daily Express Pennsylvania: Ethics Complaint Filed Against Wolf Aide Who’s Married to Gas Industry Lobbyist by Marie Cusick for StateImpact Pennsylvania Campaign Finance Washington: PDC Complaints Becoming Weapons in Political Wars by Jim Camden for Spokane Spokesman Review [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 2:35 am
By Phillip Tate and Michael Kiely Two cases filed in Sacramento County, City of Cerritos v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 5:04 am
In fact, in Polanski's case it is even more than fair as the prosecutor went so far as to have ex-parte conversations with the court and it seems made a fair sentence for Polansky impossible. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 5:19 am by Paras Shah
The state’s governor, Tate Reeves, declared a state of emergency on Saturday. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
As part of the campaign, NWAC sought help from a range of federal government departments to address the issue. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:15 am by Telecommunications Practice Group
Section 253 provides that “no [s]tate or local statute or regulation, or other [s]tate or local legal requirement, may prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the ability of any entity to provide any interstate or intrastate telecommunications service. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 5:48 pm
" Polanski's attorneys said the conversations were improper ex parte communications -- and nothing short of prosecutorial misconduct. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
  (…) In 1952, in what has been dubbed the “Tate Letter,” the State Department changed course and enunciated “a new, ‘restrictive’ theory of sovereign immunity. [read post]