Search for: "Ex Parte Walters" Results 121 - 140 of 165
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2011, 8:46 am by Nabiha Syed
And Slate finishes out its twelve-part series reviewing the Supreme Court’s Term, featuring commentary and analysis by Dahlia Lithwick, Paul Clement, and Walter Dellinger. [read post]
27 May 2011, 4:38 am by Jon Hyman
For his part, Camping now says that May 21 was a “spiritual” Judgment Day. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 6:13 am by Amanda Rice
Dorf on Law’s Mike Dorf discusses Tuesday’s decision in Virginia Office for Protection and Advocacy v .Stewart, in which the Court held that Ex Parte Young permits a federal court to hear a lawsuit for prospective relief against state officials brought by another agency of the same state. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 4:05 am
”Accordingly, the Appellate Division ruled that the hearing officer’s determination that Toolasprashad’s failure to appear “was without good cause” lacked the requisite proof, citing People ex rel. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 8:05 am by Kenneth Anderson
As far as the future of the global project over climate change is, I would point you to Walter Russell Mead’s new blog essay on Cancun (h/t Instapundit) (for the glass-half-filled view, see this news story from the NYT; note that it is filed from DC and NY, not Cancun).   [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 4:36 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Walter GmbH sought a trademark on the James Bond Walter PPK:The mark consists of the three-dimensional configuration of a pistol. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 6:08 am by Jon Hyman
Here’s the rest of what I read this week: SCOTUS Supreme Court Watch: Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3 – from Maribeth Minella at the Delaware Employment Law Blog SCOTUS: Is an oral complaint protected conduct under FLSA’s anti-retaliation provision? [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 4:46 pm by Colin O'Keefe
- West Des Moines attorney Steve Lombardi on his blog, The Iowa Edict Broken Promises, Part 2: Nathan v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 11:28 am by Patrick
A few thoughts: 1) As Walter Olson points out, President Obama’s assertion that he is going to make BP pay for all of the costs of its negligence is ludicrous.  [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 4:49 am by Stephen Page
It matters not that proceedings are in a criminal court, an appeal court, a civil court or a court exercising jurisdiction in family law; nor does it matter whether proceedings are ex parte or defended, or whether the other party is represented or unrepresented: counsel must not knowingly mislead the court, or allow it to be misled.And:In what might be regarded as some form of self-fulfilling prophecy, counsel’s extraordinary behaviour in the present case seems to have led… [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm by Todd Zywicki
And even though the Board of Trustees eliminated parity a few years ago, alumni still elect one-third of the non ex-officio trustees.  [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 10:45 am by charonqc
On the subject of Bankers – Walter Olson of Overlawyered tweeted a link to an interesting and critical article:  [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 6:14 am by Weisman, Young & Ruemenapp, P.C.
So Walter and his wife conjured up the divorce scenario as a ruse to get the assets to her as part of a property settlement. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 6:14 am
So Walter and his wife conjured up the divorce scenario as a ruse to get the assets to her as part of a property settlement. [read post]