Search for: "Ex Parte Webster" Results 1 - 20 of 79
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2022, 6:43 am by familoo
In Norfolk County Council v Webster & Ors [2006] EWHC 2733 (Fam), a case decided [pre-rule change], Munby J […] held that a case where journalists were permitted to enter court and observe the proceedings under an ad hoc arrangement was not one held “in private” for the purposes of section 12 of the 1960 Act. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am by Eugene Volokh
[Or for that matter to women, to unmarried women, or to women based on age, race, national origin, religion, citizenship (other-"natural-born" or otherwise), and the like?] [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am by Daniel J. Hemel
” Allowing ex-rebels to dominate the state legislature would seem to be at odds with that object. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:04 pm by Andrew Hamm
The district court ruled that Ex parte Young applied because Congress’ approval of the compact made it binding federal law. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 6:59 am by Eric Goldman
Distracted tweeting kills lives, careers, dreams and Oscars * Time: Meet the Woman Behind Merriam-Webster’s Viral Twitter Account * Wired: An Oral History of the #Hashtag * Polinsky v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am by Eugene Volokh
(defining “intimidate” by reference to definition in Webster’s Third New International Dictionary). [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 1:55 pm by Giles Peaker
The conduct of Mr Beattie, which was considered by Webster J to amount to a device (see R v Eastleigh Borough Council, ex p. [read post]
25 May 2017, 8:39 pm by JD Hull
Webster, not a Duke professor or a journalist. [read post]
17 May 2017, 2:38 pm by Adam Gillette
       (d) In an ex parte proceeding, a lawyer shall inform the tribunal of all material facts known to the lawyer that will enable the tribunal to make an informed decision, whether or not the facts are adverse.The local rule is pretty much the same as the American Bar Associations model rule on candor towards the court. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 2:22 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
We remand as to part of theinjunction, i.e., insofar as the injunction reaches conductby Cooler Master (regarding the covered products) thatgoes beyond abetting a new violation by CMI. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 2:08 pm
See, e.g., Webster’s Third New International Dictionary 2280 (defs. 1c, 2c) (1981) (Webster’s Third) (“important, essen­tial,” or “considerable in amount, value, or worth”); Oxford English Dictionary 67 (defs. 5a, 9) (2d ed. 1989) (OED) (“That is, constitutes, or involves an essential part, point, or feature; essential, material,” or “Of ample or considerable amount, quantity, or dimensions”).The context in… [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 6:08 am by Sarah Tate Chambers
What follows is the first in a three-part series of Judge Gorsuch’s treatment of cyber-related issues. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 3:48 am by Scott Bomboy
In Ex Parte Nugent, the judge said that, “the court is unanimously of opinion that the Senate of the United States has power, when acting in a case within its jurisdiction, to punish all contempts of its authority. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
A House of Lords Committee has heavily criticised the data sharing provisions in Part V of the Digital Economy Bill; it has reported that the provisions should not be supported in their current form. [read post]