Search for: "Ex Parte Webster" Results 1 - 20 of 89
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The statements were filed as part of a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of a new state law limiting release of the governor’s travel records. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:52 am by Alex Phipps
Considering (1), the Court of Appeals first explained the two-part test for whether to grant new appointed counsel from State v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
While many of these GOP lawmakers have cast votes this year to limit abortion access – maintaining a stance that some Republicans concede hurt their party in last year’s midterm elections – others spent part of the congressional recess talking up their support for birth control access, which is broadly popular across the country and across party lines. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Supreme Court Justices and Donors Mingle at Campus Visits. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
In Ex Parte Merryman (1861), Taney ruled that only Congress had the power to suspend the writ. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The money that went to Trump’s legal bills was part of more than $16 million that Save America spent for legal-related payments in 2021 and 2022. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am by familoo
In Norfolk County Council v Webster & Ors [2006] EWHC 2733 (Fam), a case decided [pre-rule change], Munby J […] held that a case where journalists were permitted to enter court and observe the proceedings under an ad hoc arrangement was not one held “in private” for the purposes of section 12 of the 1960 Act. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am by Eugene Volokh
[Or for that matter to women, to unmarried women, or to women based on age, race, national origin, religion, citizenship (other-"natural-born" or otherwise), and the like?] [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am by Daniel J. Hemel
” Allowing ex-rebels to dominate the state legislature would seem to be at odds with that object. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:04 pm by Andrew Hamm
The district court ruled that Ex parte Young applied because Congress’ approval of the compact made it binding federal law. [read post]