Search for: "Ex Parte Yerger" Results 1 - 8 of 8
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2013, 12:00 am by Philip Thomas
To answer that question you need to read Judge Weill’s 123-page opinion where he found that Eaton intentionally failed to produce documents that showed that Eaton sanctioned and encouraged Ed Peters’ ex parte contact with Judge Bobby DeLaughter. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 3:25 pm by Philip Thomas
Judge Yerger's opinion states that Eaton in-house counsel were aware of Ed Peters' improper ex parte contacts with Judge DeLaughter. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 12:00 am by Philip Thomas
This one cost Eaton a $1.56 million sanction. by Judge Yerger in 2010 for hiring Ed Peters to improperly influence ex-Judge Bobby DeLaughter. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
The statute at issue in McCardle cut off one avenue to the Supreme Court but left an alternative path open, as the Court said in McCardle itself and confirmed shortly thereafter in Ex Parte Yerger. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 12:00 am by Philip Thomas
Peters conducted improper ex parte communications with DeLaughter on Eaton’s behalf, including getting DeLaugher to replace Jack Dunbar with Larry Latham as special master. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 8:34 am by Timothy Sandefur, guest-blogging
Supreme Court, resulting in the famous case of Ex Parte Yerger, 75 U.S. (8 Wall.) 85 (1868). [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 4:00 am by Philip Thomas
p. 39: this documents [handwritten notes] indicates Peters only relayed his improper ex parted communications with certain team members for Eaton. [read post]