Search for: "Ex parte Garland" Results 1 - 20 of 64
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2021, 7:21 am by John Floyd
“In-camera ex parte” means the trial court could review the evidence in their chambers privately without the attorneys or parties present. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Justice Department Issues Policy Limiting White House Contact MSN – Josh Gerstein (Politico) | Published: 7/21/2021 Attorney General Merrick Garland issued a directive seeking to limit political influence on law enforcement matters by strictly limiting contacts between Justice Department personnel and the White House. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Lawmakers have also attempted to retroactively undo parts of initiatives approved by voters in some states. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Garland Announces Expansion of Justice Department’s Voting Rights Unit, Vowing to Scrutinize GOP-Backed Voting Restrictions and Ballot Reviews MSN – Amy Gardner and Sean Sullivan (Washington Post) | Published: 6/11/2021 Attorney General Merrick Garland pledged to double the size of the Justice Department’s voting rights enforcement staff to combat efforts to restrict ballot access and prosecute those who threaten or harm election workers. [read post]
20 May 2021, 5:01 am by Kellen Dwyer
Yet, when Attorney General Merrick Garland appeared before the House Appropriations Committee earlier this month to highlight the key priorities in the department’s 2022 budget request, cyber did not make the list. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
It is truly odd that lawyers across the political spectrum have acted as if the provision creating the pardon power is unambiguous, when it is anything but.The Supreme Court case to which naïve reporters point, 1866’s Ex Parte Garland, does indeed say that the pardon power is “unlimited,” but that opinion then very clearly describes a pardon power that is in fact limited. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Congressional Fundraisers Lobby Corporations That Suspended Political Donations Following Capitol Riot MSN – Brian Schwartz (CNBC) | Published: 3/19/2021 Fundraisers for congressional candidates and party campaign arms have been lobbying corporations to resume donating after many suspended their political contributions. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
A January 26 piece asserts confidently that “[t]he Supreme Court has ruled that the Constitution gives presidents unlimited authority to grant pardons,” but the link embedded in “pardons” leads to another Times column that does not support that assertion.What these journalists seem to be relying upon, other than citing each other’s unsourced assertions, is the Court’s 1866 decision in Ex Parte Garland. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
And that’s the danger.This is actually not an argument at all, because all he is saying is that convicting Trump could affect other ex-presidents “in a negative way,” which is “the danger. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 10:52 pm by Everyday Law Staff
In Ex parte Garland, the Supreme Court ruled that a president can issue a pardon at any time after commission of a crime. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:31 pm by Scott Bomboy
The Ex parte Garland decision also made it clear that Congress did not have the power to intervene in the presidential pardon process. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 12:38 pm by Amy Howe
In Ex parte Garland, which involved President Andrew Johnson’s pardon of a lawyer who had served in the legislature of the Confederacy, the court indicated that the president’s pardon power covers all federal offenses. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am by Marty Lederman
  The House counters that they’re misreading those statutes and that therefore there aren’t any appropriated funds for major parts of the project.In both cases, the Executive branch is arguing that the House (or its Committee) lacks Article III standing to sue. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 3:49 am by Scott Bomboy
The Ex parte Garland decision also make it clear that Congress did not have the direct power to intervene in the presidential pardon process. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 5:04 am by SHG
Recommendations followed, announced by no less adored a jurist than the benighted Merrick Garland. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 8:15 am by Joshua Holt
Elle follows her ex, Warner Huntington III (played by Matthew Davis), to Harvard law school after he breaks up with her on the night when she expects him to propose. [read post]