Search for: "Ex parte Lange" Results 1 - 20 of 344
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2013, 7:34 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
PTAB reversed indefiniteness and obviousness rejections in Ex parte Lang [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 4:20 am by Scott A. McKeown
So, with the availability of the more robust IPR option, and the attendant price increase to ex parte reexamination, is there still value in pursuing an ex parte patent reexamination proceeding? [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 1:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
The Notice provides in more detail that: An ex parte reexamination requester has the option to remain anonymous. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 3:08 am by Stephen G. Kunin
Hisamitsu Pharmaceutical requested ex parte reexamination of only claims 1, 3 and 6 of its own U.S. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 3:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
Request Ex Parte Patent Reexamination, Lose, Repeat For Patent Owners, one of the more frustrating aspects of ex parte patent reexamination is that the experience can be never ending. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
On Tuesday, the BPAI seemingly ended the 10 year saga of Ex Parte Gary E. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 3:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
RGB had earlier sought ex parte reexamination of the same patent based upon the same prior art now applied in the district court proceeding. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
In this case, the patents were subject to inter partes patent reexamination; yet the defendants opted for the lower risk, ex parte option. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 3:10 am by Stephen G. Kunin
USPTO statistics demonstrate that Patent Owner’s fair much better in ex parte patent reexamination as opposed to inter partes patent reexamination. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
Yet, in many cases ex parte patent reexamination is requested anonymously. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
 The rules are limited to ex parte proceedings only and have no bearing on patent interferences, or inter partes patent reexamination. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
However, this is an ex parte application by Defendant, which means that the Defendant is not permitted to have any further input. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 3:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
New Ex Parte Patent Reexamination Pilot Program a Tough Sell Back in August, I reported on a new USPTO pilot program designed to decrease pendency in ex parte patent reexamination by seeking waiver of the right to file a Patent Owner Statement. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 3:15 am by Scott A. McKeown
In rejecting this nexus, the BPAI relied on Ex parte Remark, 15 USPQ2d 1498, 1502-03 (BPAI 1990). [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 10:50 am by Record on Appeal
Riethbrock's argument that the Family Court erred in granting an ex parte motion to release escrow funds because the order occured after the notice of appeal was filed. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 3:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
Therasense Decision to Influence the Choice Between Ex Parte vs. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:15 am by Scott A. McKeown
Since this change was made effective as of last Friday, it looks like ex parte Yasukochi may at least obtain a rehearing on the SNQ aspect of their appeal. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 1:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
New Rules for Ex Parte Practice Effective January 23rd 2012 For those seeking a quick briefing on the new Rules of Practice Before the Board of Patent Appeals & Interferences in Ex Parte Appeals. [read post]