Search for: "Exploration Co., Ltd. v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 79
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2019, 4:27 am
Norton & Co Ltd [1996] RPC 76 and Gillette Safety Razer Co v Anglo-American Trading Co (1913) 30 RPC 465 as precedent for this.However, according to HHJ Hacon "in modern practice this is not strictly a standalone defence to infringement". [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Peter Checkland, Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Chichester : John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 1999) is then a critical element in the way in which the legal system (in this case of the United States) interacts with the world, both as a legal and as a socio-economic-political actor. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
It obtained an award from a London arbitral tribunal against three Chinese companies, Dalian Dong Zhan Group Co., Beitai Iron & Steel Group Importing & Exporting Co., and Hong Kong Dongzhan Logistics Ltd., for breach of a maritime contract. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 4:36 am by Larry Catá Backer
While there appear to be no clear answers to me (for those with different or more elaborate views I welcome comments), I explore the possibility of such a state of "statelessness" in the materials that follow.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Before the 16th century in Europe, states were an important component of a complex system of governance, over territory, individuals, beliefs, customs and the like. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
*****PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 35 [week ending Sunday 1 March] – EPO v SUEPO | Supreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd | UK IPO on EPO | Scents and copyright | GIs under scrutiny | UPC test-drive | Is UK failing to protect innovation? [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:50 am by Tobias Thienel
This doctrine holds,in the broadest outline, that English (like U.S.) courts 'will not sit in judgment on the acts of the government of another done within its own territory' (Underhill v Hernandez, 168 U.S. 250, 252 (1897)) or 'will not adjudicate upon the transactions of foreign sovereign states' (Buttes Gas Oil Co v Hammer (No 3) [1982] AC 888, 931G). [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 8:30 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Co., 196 S.W.3d 774, 780-81 (Tex. 2006) (orig. proceeding); see also Austin Commercial Contractors, L.P. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 8:30 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Co., 196 S.W.3d 774, 780-81 (Tex. 2006) (orig. proceeding); see also Austin Commercial Contractors, L.P. v. [read post]