Search for: "Express Company v. Ware" Results 1 - 20 of 35
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2014, 6:22 am
`Statutory construction must begin with the language employed by Congress and the assumption that the ordinary meaning of that language accurately expresses the legislative purpose.' [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:09 pm by Venkat
Judge Ware found that although there was no express preemption in the statute, ECPA demonstrated a Congressional intent to comprehensively regulate the field. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 1:44 pm
The Seventh Circuit Court affirmed on August 14 that a fictional company or product cannot infringe the trademark of a real company or product. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 7:57 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Written by Lewis Waring, Paralegal, Editor, First Reference Inc. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am by INFORRM
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (2017 SCC 34). [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 8:34 am by John Jascob
The law does not demand good faith from a seller in “those vague commendations of his wares which manifestly are open to difference of opinion,” said Justice Holmes in Deming v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 6:56 am by Durga Rao
Note: The views expressed are my personal and I am ware of the vastness of the subject and complications in the course. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am by Graham Smith
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am by Graham Smith
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
    The statement in the case of Ware v Labour Party is here and the statement in the case of Buckingham and others v Labour Party is here. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
” In Fluid Energy Group Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:26 am by Barry Sookman
Equustek Solutions Inc., 2017 SCC 34 underlined the breadth of courts’ jurisdiction to make orders against search engines to stem illegal activities on the Internet including the sale of products manufactured using trade secrets misappropriated from innovative companies. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:15 am by Eric Goldman
The court distinguished several other cases on the ground that they only involved a right to reproduce and sell records, even though some of them had cited a 1937 Pennsylvania case, Waring v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:45 am by Beth Graham
Supreme Court Upholds Agreement That Bans Class Arbitration Despite Costs Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in American Express Corp. v. [read post]