Search for: "Express Company v. Ware"
Results 1 - 20
of 58
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2014, 6:22 am
`Statutory construction must begin with the language employed by Congress and the assumption that the ordinary meaning of that language accurately expresses the legislative purpose.' [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 5:27 pm
South AfricaKoko v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 12:37 pm
District Judge Vaughn Walker ruled in Perry v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 4:37 pm
On 24 February 2021, Saini J handed down judgment in a preliminary hearing on meaning in Ware v French [2021] EWHC 384 (QB). [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:09 pm
Judge Ware found that although there was no express preemption in the statute, ECPA demonstrated a Congressional intent to comprehensively regulate the field. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 1:44 pm
The Seventh Circuit Court affirmed on August 14 that a fictional company or product cannot infringe the trademark of a real company or product. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 5:39 am
By Lewis Waring, Paralegal and Student-at-Law, Editor, First Reference Inc. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (2017 SCC 34). [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 7:57 am
Written by Lewis Waring, Paralegal, Editor, First Reference Inc. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 8:34 am
The law does not demand good faith from a seller in “those vague commendations of his wares which manifestly are open to difference of opinion,” said Justice Holmes in Deming v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:56 pm
CORE v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 6:56 am
” Note: The views expressed are my personal and I am ware of the vastness of the subject and complications in the course. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 4:38 pm
The ban covers visual surveillance equipment “produced by companies subject to the National Intelligence Law of the People’s Republic of China. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:47 am
By Lewis Waring, Paralegal and Student-at-Law, Editor, First Reference Inc. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 12:49 am
Last week in the courts On 30 November 2022, Julian Knowles J handed down judgement in Ware v French [2022] EWHC 3030 (KB) awarding damages of £90,000, costs and a permanent injunction in favour of the claimant after an undefended trial. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 4:05 pm
The Court of Appeals of British Columbia, in Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 12:16 pm
Iancu v. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 7:45 am
Roe v. [read post]
