Search for: "Express Company v. Ware" Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2020, 6:47 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
By Lewis Waring, Paralegal and Student-at-Law, Editor, First Reference Inc. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
” In Fluid Energy Group Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
    The statement in the case of Ware v Labour Party is here and the statement in the case of Buckingham and others v Labour Party is here. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 7:57 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Written by Lewis Waring, Paralegal, Editor, First Reference Inc. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am by INFORRM
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (2017 SCC 34). [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am by Graham Smith
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am by Graham Smith
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:26 am by Barry Sookman
Equustek Solutions Inc., 2017 SCC 34 underlined the breadth of courts’ jurisdiction to make orders against search engines to stem illegal activities on the Internet including the sale of products manufactured using trade secrets misappropriated from innovative companies. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:15 am by Eric Goldman
The court distinguished several other cases on the ground that they only involved a right to reproduce and sell records, even though some of them had cited a 1937 Pennsylvania case, Waring v. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The newspaper company claims that such large libel awards have a “serious chilling effect” on freedom of expression. [read post]