Search for: "Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker" Results 1 - 20 of 65
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2009, 12:01 pm
Professors Joni Hersch (Vanderbilt) and Kip Viscusi (Vanderbilt) provide one critique in their paper, Punitive Damages by Numbers: Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 10:14 am
The Supreme Court will hear extended arguments in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:11 am
The Supreme Court on Friday agreed to expand the time allowed for oral argument in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 8:59 am
The record-setting $2.5 billion punitive damage award against Exxon for an Alaskan oil spill will likely be trimmed, but not eliminated, judging from the oral argument yesterday in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 5:22 am
Supreme Court has agreed to review the $2.5 billion punitive damages award in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 10:41 am
First, Joni Hersch and Kip Viscusi (both at Vandy) have posted on SSRN Punitive Damages by Numbers: Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 1:44 pm
Rick Hasen expresses understandable concern over a footnote in the recent Supreme Court opinion in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 6:36 am
Ventura, No. 1070736, ___ So.2d___ (Ala 2009), a legal malpractice action, the court held that in its recent holding in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2008, 5:25 am
In today's Washington Post:Dana Milbank's Feb. 28 column on Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 5:15 pm
Blawgletter reported yesterday about the Supreme Court's accepting review of the $2.5 billion punitive damages award in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 9:11 am by Ron Coleman
Republished by Blog Post PromoterRick Hasen expresses understandable concern over a footnote in the recent Supreme Court opinion in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]