Search for: "Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker" Results 1 - 20 of 65
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2017, 2:33 pm by Lauren Bridges
Co., No. 2016-C-1647, p. 31 (La. 10/18/17), ___ So. 3d ___. [5]              Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 2:33 pm by Lauren Bridges
Co., No. 2016-C-1647, p. 31 (La. 10/18/17), ___ So. 3d ___. [5]              Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 9:11 am by Ron Coleman
Republished by Blog Post PromoterRick Hasen expresses understandable concern over a footnote in the recent Supreme Court opinion in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 12:35 pm by Schachtman
For instance, in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
27 May 2013, 7:36 am by Ron Coleman
Republished by Blog Post PromoterRick Hasen expresses understandable concern over a footnote in the recent Supreme Court opinion in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 4:22 pm by J. Wylie Donald
National Sea Clammers Ass’n., 453 U.S. 1, 4 (1981), and Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 5:30 am by Ben Cheng
Baker decision.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (Wash.)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition KeyCorp v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 8:46 pm by Mark Murakami
The court then affirmed a punitive damage award but did not apply the Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 7:57 pm by Ben Cheng
ClausenDocket: 11-1475Issue(s): (1) Whether, in determining the ratio between compensatory and punitive damages for purposes of applying federal limits on punitive damages, court-awarded attorney’s fees are properly included as compensatory damages; and (2) whether, and to what extent, punitive damages in maritime cases may exceed the 1:1 ratio between compensatory and punitive damages applied by the Court’s Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
Baker, 554 U.S. 471 (2008), sounding in maritime law and arising out of the infamous Exxon Valdez tanker accident.  [read post]