Search for: "Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker" Results 21 - 40 of 65
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2014, 12:35 pm by Schachtman
For instance, in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
27 May 2013, 7:36 am by Ron Coleman
Republished by Blog Post PromoterRick Hasen expresses understandable concern over a footnote in the recent Supreme Court opinion in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 4:08 pm
Supreme Court’s Decision in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 4:32 pm
" Symbolically, the case of Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 4:14 pm
In that ruling, the Court did not discuss the issue of whether those who sued Exxon Shipping Co. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 6:20 pm
In its decision this week in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 4:16 pm
Continues… On Thursday, February 27, the Supreme Court hears arguments in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
The appeal is Exxon Shipping Co., et al., v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 8:46 pm by Mark Murakami
The court then affirmed a punitive damage award but did not apply the Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 7:57 pm by Ben Cheng
ClausenDocket: 11-1475Issue(s): (1) Whether, in determining the ratio between compensatory and punitive damages for purposes of applying federal limits on punitive damages, court-awarded attorney’s fees are properly included as compensatory damages; and (2) whether, and to what extent, punitive damages in maritime cases may exceed the 1:1 ratio between compensatory and punitive damages applied by the Court’s Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 10:03 am
U.S. (07-214)– proof needed to show false claim in federal contracting Wed., Feb. 27: Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 1:13 pm
Second, in case you missed it, footnote 17 in Justice David Souter's opinion in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]