Search for: "Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker" Results 21 - 40 of 128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2008, 2:35 pm
Supreme Court issued opinions in three of its ten undecided cases from this term, but the Court still hasn't ruled on the Exxon Valdez punitive damages case (Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:24 pm
Professor Rick Hasen at Election Law Blog has posted an interesting comment on this footnote (fn. 17) in the Exxon Valdez (Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:11 am
The Supreme Court on Friday agreed to expand the time allowed for oral argument in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 6:11 pm
The Associated Press is reporting (via the Seattle Post Intelligencer) that the parties in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:56 pm
Supreme Court by the State of Alaska in the Exxon Valdez case (Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 8:59 am
The record-setting $2.5 billion punitive damage award against Exxon for an Alaskan oil spill will likely be trimmed, but not eliminated, judging from the oral argument yesterday in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 2:50 am
Rex Heeseman, a superior court judge in Los Angeles County and an adjunct law professor at Loyola Law School, wrote an op-ed in the Daily Journal entitled "Award Season" (subscription required) discussing the Exxon Valdez decision (Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 5:22 am
Supreme Court has agreed to review the $2.5 billion punitive damages award in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 6:04 pm
Supreme Court's decision not to decide whether the plaintiffs in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 10:41 am
First, Joni Hersch and Kip Viscusi (both at Vandy) have posted on SSRN Punitive Damages by Numbers: Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
2 May 2009, 3:51 am
Here is the abstract: Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 1:44 pm
Rick Hasen expresses understandable concern over a footnote in the recent Supreme Court opinion in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 6:36 am
Ventura, No. 1070736, ___ So.2d___ (Ala 2009), a legal malpractice action, the court held that in its recent holding in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]