Search for: "Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker" Results 21 - 40 of 128
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2012, 8:46 pm by Mark Murakami
  The court then affirmed a punitive damage award but did not apply the Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 7:57 pm by Ben Cheng
ClausenDocket: 11-1475Issue(s): (1) Whether, in determining the ratio between compensatory and punitive damages for purposes of applying federal limits on punitive damages, court-awarded attorney’s fees are properly included as compensatory damages; and (2) whether, and to what extent, punitive damages in maritime cases may exceed the 1:1 ratio between compensatory and punitive damages applied by the Court’s Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:41 pm by Lawrence Solum
Supreme Court’s de facto cap that it placed on punitive damages in maritime cases in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
”The Court then elaborated on the one-to-one ratio in a non-constitutional case, Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 7:18 am
Affirming the punitive damage award, the panel rejects an argument that the court "extend Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 9:15 am by Lawrence Solum
Klass (University of Minnesota Law School) has posted Punitive Damages after Exxon Shipping Company v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 6:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
On May 11, Whitehouse introduced the Big Oil Polluter Pays Act to overturn the 2008 Supreme Court decision in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 6:19 am by James Bickford
Several senators are considering legislation that would overturn the 1:1 ratio of punitive to compensatory damages established in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]