Search for: "Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker" Results 101 - 120 of 128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2009, 11:00 am
  Interestingly, the Tennessee court chose not to acknowledge the Supreme Court’s most recent punitive damage decision from Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 5:51 pm
It is necessary, in examining what the Court has done in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 10:36 am
 In addition, while the Supreme Court has declined to explicitly set a 1:1 ratio as a constitutional limit, it has employed that ratio in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:41 pm by Lawrence Solum
Supreme Court’s de facto cap that it placed on punitive damages in maritime cases in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
Williams, we posted that the writing was clearly on the wall to the effect that punitive damages had "peaked out" in American law.That conclusion was strongly supported in the US Supreme Court's recent decision in the Exxon Valdez punitive damages case, Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 6:19 am by James Bickford
Several senators are considering legislation that would overturn the 1:1 ratio of punitive to compensatory damages established in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 6:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
On May 11, Whitehouse introduced the Big Oil Polluter Pays Act to overturn the 2008 Supreme Court decision in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 4:23 am
I speak, of course, about Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]