Search for: "Ezell v. Ezell"
Results 1 - 20
of 69
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2025, 9:43 am
” On February 5, 2025, Acting OPM Director Charles Ezell provided additional insight into how OPM, at least, views the scope of the President’s Orders. [read post]
3 Apr 2025, 10:15 am
For the order denying the motion to dismiss: https://www.eff.org/document/afge-v-opm-opinion-and-order-motion-dismiss For the complaint: https://www.eff.org/document/afge-v-opm-complaint For more about the case: https://www.eff.org/cases/american-federation-government-employees-v-us-office-personnel-management Contacts Electronic Frontier Foundation: press@eff.org Lex Lumina LLP: Managing Partner Rhett Millsaps,… [read post]
13 Mar 2025, 5:54 am
Maryland v. [read post]
[Stephen Halbrook] Second Amendment Roundup: Rehearing En Banc Sought in 5th Circuit Suppressor Case
11 Mar 2025, 6:24 pm
That's why, for instance, shooting ranges have Second Amendment protection, as Ezell v. [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 11:06 am
Játékok, promóciók és változatos banki módszerek széles választékát kínálja, amelyek között a kriptovaluták is szerepelnek. [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 11:06 am
Játékok, promóciók és változatos banki módszerek széles választékát kínálja, amelyek között a kriptovaluták is szerepelnek. [read post]
11 Feb 2025, 2:34 pm
The complaint by EFF, Lex Lumina LLP, State Democracy Defenders Fund, and The Chandra Law Firm argues that OPM and OPM Acting Director Charles Ezell illegally disclosed personnel records to Musk’s DOGE in violation of the federal Privacy Act of 1974. [read post]
5 Feb 2025, 10:26 pm
Doe; Brazilian Worker Center, Inc; La Colaborativa v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 2:07 pm
City and County of San Francisco, 746 F.3d 953, 967 (C.A.9 2014) (internal quotation marks omitted), and "to acquire and maintain proficiency in their use," Ezell v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:41 pm
In alignment with this, the Seventh Circuit in Ezell v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 7:28 pm
The Georgia Supreme Court, in Nunn v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 6:01 am
This answer is discussed in a 1942, Texas Supreme Court opinion styled, Drane v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
Heller v. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 4:21 am
’” (citation omitted)); Ezell v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:47 am
As stated in the 1942, Texas Supreme Court opinion, Drane v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 12:54 pm
The Court based its assertion on Boerschig v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
Kevin Ezell, president of NAMB, to discuss a new SPA. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 7:05 pm
In McRaney v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 7:06 am
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit held in Ezell v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 1:42 pm
Quidel Corp. v. [read post]
