Search for: "Ezell v. Ezell"
Results 21 - 40
of 69
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2023, 6:01 am
This answer is discussed in a 1942, Texas Supreme Court opinion styled, Drane v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 8:10 pm
One of those opinions, a Seventh Circuit ruling in Ezell v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:47 am
As stated in the 1942, Texas Supreme Court opinion, Drane v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 9:49 pm
The petition before the Court, in Gilbert v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 3:26 am
The Court pointed out that this exact issue was decided by the Tennessee Supreme Court in Ezell v. [read post]
4 May 2013, 8:07 am
A 1942, Texas Court of Appeals case styled, Drane v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 9:13 pm
Ezell v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 11:51 am
The Texas Supreme Court in 1942, in the case, Drane v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 11:51 am
The Texas Supreme Court in 1942, in the case, Drane v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 1:42 pm
Quidel Corp. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 4:21 am
’” (citation omitted)); Ezell v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 7:00 pm
State & Johnny Adams, Jr. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:26 am
Ezell Gilbert is not now, nor has he ever been, a career offender. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 7:54 am
See Hanson v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 10:47 am
— Ezell v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 7:39 am
See See Prilliman v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:05 pm
To them, the majority ignored a bedrock principle of bankruptcy law, which Justice Alito most recently reiterated in Travelers v. [read post]
3 Apr 2025, 10:15 am
For the order denying the motion to dismiss: https://www.eff.org/document/afge-v-opm-opinion-and-order-motion-dismiss For the complaint: https://www.eff.org/document/afge-v-opm-complaint For more about the case: https://www.eff.org/cases/american-federation-government-employees-v-us-office-personnel-management Contacts Electronic Frontier Foundation: press@eff.org Lex Lumina LLP: Managing Partner Rhett Millsaps,… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 4:50 am
Then, the Supremes decide Begay v. [read post]
11 Feb 2025, 2:34 pm
The complaint by EFF, Lex Lumina LLP, State Democracy Defenders Fund, and The Chandra Law Firm argues that OPM and OPM Acting Director Charles Ezell illegally disclosed personnel records to Musk’s DOGE in violation of the federal Privacy Act of 1974. [read post]