Search for: "FCC v. Columbia Broadcasting System" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2019, 11:36 am by FHH Law
The report should be filed in Docket No. 16-233 of the FCC’s ECFS filing systems. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 8:00 am by FHH Law
Television License Renewal Applications Due – Applications for renewal of license for television stations located in the District of Columbia, Maryland, Virginia, and West Virginia must be filed in the Commission’s License and Management System. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 1:16 pm by FHH Law
Television License Renewal Applications Due – Applications for renewal of license for television stations located in the District of Columbia, Maryland, Virginia, and West Virginia must be filed in the Commission’s License and Management System. [read post]
26 May 2020, 8:00 am by FHH Law
The report should be filed in Docket No. 16-233 of the FCC’s Electronic Comment Filing System (“ECFS”). [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 11:28 am by Scott R. Flick and Elizabeth Craig
The FCC noted in its 2019 letter to the licensee that Section 312(g) is clear that “[i]f a broadcasting station fails to transmit broadcast signals for any consecutive 12-month period, then the station license granted for the operation of that broadcast station expires at the end of that period. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:38 am by FHH Law
Broadcast Deadlines: April 1, 2019:         License Renewal Pre-Filing Announcements – Radio stations located in the District of Columbia, Maryland, Virginia, and West Virginia must begin their pre-filing announcements with regard to their applications for renewal of license. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 11:48 pm
Verizon's Petition and Analysis of Potential Causes of Action On September 10, 2007, Verizon petitioned the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia to review the FCC's open access requirements on 700 MHz Block C.[27] The petition lays out a number of general grounds to overturn these open access requirements. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:37 am by David Kravets
The appeals court in the Fox issue ruled that the FCC’s policy was unconstitutionally vague because “broadcasters are left to guess whether an expletive will be deemed ‘integral’ to a program or whether the FCC will consider a particular broadcast a ‘bona fide news interview. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:12 am by Berin Szoka
We explained how the intellectual foundations for this regulatory creep have already been laid by groups like Free Press and Public Knowledge and law professors like Columbia’s Tim Wu (father of “Net Neutrality”), Harvard’s Jonathan Zittrain (father of “API/device Neutrality”), and Seton Hall’s Frank Pasquale (father of “Search Neutrality”). [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm by Guest Author
 The Court has upheld laws like that in many instances, including Turner (requiring that cable systems carry broadcast television channels), Rumsfeld v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am by INFORRM
Media law in other jurisdictions Australia On 16 October 2023, judgement was handed down in the case of Russell v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (No 3) [2023] FCA 1123. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by Adam Thierer
 Most famously, taxes on radios, eventually replaced by taxes on televisions, have sustained the BBC in the U.K. since its inception as the world’s first national broadcasting system in 1922. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Michigan Chamber of Commerce and of the four dissenters in Citizens United v. [read post]