Search for: "FCC v. Pacifica Foundation" Results 21 - 40 of 59
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2012, 10:46 am by Eugene Volokh
Pacifica Foundation (1978), the Court did uphold restrictions on vulgar words on the radio — a question that’s now being reconsidered by the Court, in FCC v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 7:15 pm by Andrew Koppelman
Pacifica Foundation (and Its Second Life)Adam M. [read post]
2 May 2014, 8:29 am
New York (1968), which upheld a ban on selling sexually themed material to minors, and FCC v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
Pacifica Foundation, upholding the policy as it then existed. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 4:38 pm by Lyle Denniston
Pacifica Foundation), and noted that broadcasters and the FCC are still in dispute about just how much authority the Commission has under that ruling.   [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 11:39 am by Harry Cole
The broadcast of that track – on Pacifica Foundation’s Station WBAI(FM) in New York in 1973 – set in motion the FCC’s enforcement action that resulted in the 1978 Supreme Court decision FCC v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 10:36 pm
There simply is no way to reconcile FCC v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 1:01 pm by Jonathan E. Allen
Pacifica Foundation granting the FCC limited authority under the First Amendment to regulate broadcast indecency. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 7:36 am by Eugene Volokh
One common argument in support of indecency regulations is that they merely restrict certain modes of expression, and leave people entirely free to express whatever ideas they like; as Justice Stevens put it, defending the indecency restriction in FCC v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 5:34 pm
PACIFICA FOUNDATION ET AL. 438 U.S. 726 (1978). [read post]