Search for: "FCC v. Pacifica Foundation" Results 41 - 58 of 58
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm by Lyle Denniston
Pacifica Foundation in 1978, to take context into account in determining whether a given utterance or depiction was “indecent.” [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 2:00 am by Dave Wieneke
Consider the FCC’s efforts to protect Americans from “dirty words” in FCC v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 5:12 am by Eugene Volokh
California, which recognized a general right to display vulgarities in public places, was incorrect, and FCC v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 3:17 pm
Pacifica Foundation, ruling that the FCC did have the authority under federal law to regulate broadcast speech that was "indecent" but not obscene. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 7:36 am by Eugene Volokh
New York, 390 U.S. 629 (1968),] and [FCC v.] [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 1:48 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
”]  There was also no substantial interest in protecting the public from scandalousness and profanities under FCC v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:35 pm by Kevin
(One of those cases was FCC v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 6:56 am by Erin Miller
Pacifica Foundation (1978), allowing non-criminal regulation on radio and television of “patently offensive words dealing with sex and excretion.”  [read post]