Search for: "FCC v. Pacifica Foundation"
Results 61 - 80
of 83
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2010, 2:20 pm
And, as we stated in FCC v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 5:12 am
California, which recognized a general right to display vulgarities in public places, was incorrect, and FCC v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 3:17 pm
Pacifica Foundation, ruling that the FCC did have the authority under federal law to regulate broadcast speech that was "indecent" but not obscene. [read post]
7 May 2021, 8:59 am
Note that even in the 1969 FCC statement that calls "[r]igging or slanting the news" "a most heinous act against the public interest," the FCC made clear that: But in this democracy, no Government agency can authenticate the news, or should try to do so. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 5:48 pm
[4] Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm
Pacifica Foundation in 1978, to take context into account in determining whether a given utterance or depiction was “indecent. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 12:23 pm
The upshot of FCC v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 5:20 am
Borrowing from the Supreme Court's "7 Dirty Words Case" (FCC v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 7:36 am
New York, 390 U.S. 629 (1968),] and [FCC v.] [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 7:25 pm
Pacifica Foundation, 438 U.S. 726 (1978). [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 11:16 am
” Indeed, even FCC v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:34 am
Pacifica Foundation [which permitted FCC sanction of a 12-minute monologue by George Carlin repeating seven expletives] that this would suggest that the actions here were unconstitutional because this goes way beyond Pacifica and deals with fleeting expletives. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 4:30 am
[See FCC v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 1:48 pm
”] There was also no substantial interest in protecting the public from scandalousness and profanities under FCC v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:35 pm
(One of those cases was FCC v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 3:18 pm
In Sgaggio v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 5:44 am
Pacifica Foundation, supra, at 438 U. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 6:56 am
Pacifica Foundation (1978), allowing non-criminal regulation on radio and television of “patently offensive words dealing with sex and excretion. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 9:13 am
" As we said in Tinker v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 4:54 pm
Pacifica Foundation, 438 U.S. 726 (1978). [read post]