Search for: "FCC v. Pacifica Foundation" Results 61 - 80 of 83
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2019, 5:12 am by Eugene Volokh
California, which recognized a general right to display vulgarities in public places, was incorrect, and FCC v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 3:17 pm
Pacifica Foundation, ruling that the FCC did have the authority under federal law to regulate broadcast speech that was "indecent" but not obscene. [read post]
7 May 2021, 8:59 am by Eugene Volokh
Note that even in the 1969 FCC statement that calls "[r]igging or slanting the news" "a most heinous act against the public interest," the FCC made clear that: But in this democracy, no Government agency can authenticate the news, or should try to do so. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm by Lyle Denniston
Pacifica Foundation in 1978, to take context into account in determining whether a given utterance or depiction was “indecent. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 7:36 am by Eugene Volokh
New York, 390 U.S. 629 (1968),] and [FCC v.] [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:34 am by Adam Wahlberg
Pacifica Foundation [which permitted FCC sanction of a 12-minute monologue by George Carlin repeating seven expletives] that this would suggest that the actions here were unconstitutional because this goes way beyond Pacifica and deals with fleeting expletives. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 1:48 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
”]  There was also no substantial interest in protecting the public from scandalousness and profanities under FCC v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:35 pm by Kevin
(One of those cases was FCC v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 6:56 am by Erin Miller
Pacifica Foundation (1978), allowing non-criminal regulation on radio and television of “patently offensive words dealing with sex and excretion. [read post]