Search for: "FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2016, 7:31 am by tortsprof
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. to the extent that Florida state tort law threatens to ban the sale of cigarettes. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 6:25 pm by FDABlog HPM
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120 (2000), in which “the Court pushed back on the FDA when it sought to include cigarettes and tobacco as drugs under the [FDCA]…”  The Report goes on to state that, “…even if it takes great skill to figure out how to regulate drugs, and the government’s broad claims for Chevron deference here should not override the ordinary meaning of… [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 9:27 am by Steve Davies
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120 (2000), “similarly misplaced,” Massachusetts v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 11:16 am
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 139 (2000) (where Congress “reveal[ed] its intent that tobacco products remain on the market . [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 5:18 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 125 (2000) (quoting ETSI Pipeline Project v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 12:27 pm by Lawrence Solum
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 133 (2000) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 12:13 pm
  First of all, the position was unprecedented:[N]o court has ever found that a product is “intended for use” or “intended to affect” within the meaning of the FDCA absent manufacturer claims as to that product’s use.Id. at 417 (quoting Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 8:27 pm by Adam White
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., which held that the FDA exceeded its statutory limits by attempting to regulate tobacco. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:12 pm by Kurt R. Karst
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120 (2000), FDA had claimed authority under the FDCA to regulate cigarettes and smokeless tobacco, on the ground that nicotine was a drug and cigarettes and smokeless tobacco were drug delivery devices. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 9:05 am
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 133 (2000) (internal quotation marks omitted); Wolf Run Mining Co. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 7:27 am
Brown &;amp; Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 132 (2000) ("If Congress has done so, the inquiry is at an end; the court must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc., 1999 WL 980159, at *1 (E.D. [read post]