Search for: "FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. FACEBOOK INC." Results 101 - 120 of 184
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
The federal court heard that TV stations supporting the Claimant commissioned a secret report into the war crime allegations. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
– ownership of IP: (Dilanchian), Consultant or contractor IP: (Dilanchian), IP and general business law issues: Website terms of use reduce risk: (Dilanchian), Plant breeder’s rights actions in the Federal Court will now be regarded as IP cases for the purpose of docket allocation: (IPwar’s), Ajinomoto v NutraSweet – inventive step and costs: (IPRoo), Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft 2020 submission:… [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm by INFORRM
Quebecor Media Inc. et al, 2022 ONSC 3749. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(IP finance) Software patents at the UK IPO (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog)   United States US General Open letter to Obama: Uncle Sam should go open source (Ars Technica) EFF relaunches legal guide for bloggers (EFF)   US General – Lawsuits and strategic steps Facebook – Facebook, UConnect trade secrets settlement deal worth $65 million according to Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges (Law360)   US Patents… [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
IP Kat covers the case of Warner Music and Another v TuneIn Inc a case concerning copyright infringement via the use of hyperlinks. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
  Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to… [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom… [read post]
On July 30, 2021, the FTC requested that the Court grant its Unopposed Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss the Reverse Payment Claims with Prejudice, as the Supreme Court held “that the FTC does not have authority to seek monetary relief in federal court under Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by Euan Sinclair
For an example, look no further than the celebrated Costeja v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 1:42 pm by Ben
This morning, at least one copyright owner vowed to launch a major lawsuit against Pai, the Federal Communications Commission, or both. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 5:01 am by Hilary Hurd
Most famously, in Capital Cities/ABC, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
The case of Arabic language: (Intellectual Property Watch), Facebook – Is it commercially more than a bunch of pretty faces? [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 1:55 am by INFORRM
On 9 September 2024, a unanimous decision from the Federal Court of Appeal fully reversed the factual conclusions of the court below to conclude that Facebook had violated the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act in connection with the Cambridge Analytica scandal, Canada (Privacy Commissioner) v Facebook, Inc 2024 FCA 140. [read post]