Search for: "FEDERER v. DAVIS" Results 21 - 40 of 2,704
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2014, 3:00 am by NCC Staff
In fact, the 14th Amendment had been passed during the time of Davis’ indictment in the federal court system, when the case of United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 3:00 am by NCC Staff
In fact, the 14th Amendment had been passed during the time of Davis’ indictment in the federal court system, when the case of United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 3:00 am by NCC Staff
In fact, the 14th Amendment had been passed during the time of Davis’ indictment in the federal court system, when the case of United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 5:55 am
Ted Davis, in his latest article entitled "Content-Based Prohibitions on Federal Registration and the Constitutional Right to Petition," provides a different "slant" on the role of the First Amendment in the application of Section 2(a) in the REDSKINS case, Pro Football, Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 6:24 am
The Davis-Bacon Act (now 40 USC § 3141 et seq.) is a federal law which requires the payment of prevailing wages on federally funded public works projects. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 2:45 pm
  Davis had previously filed a federal habeas petition in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia in 2001, alleging, among other things, violations of Giglio v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:12 pm by David Lat
Davis served as special counsel to President Bill Clinton, who offers a testimonial on Davis’s (somewhat barebones) website, and Boies represented Al Gore in Bush v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 6:22 am by Neal Davis
The post Federal Judge Throws Out Confession Statement of Neal Davis’ Client in Child Porn Case appeared first on Neal Davis Blog. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 6:22 am by Neal Davis
The post Federal Judge Throws Out Confession Statement of Neal Davis’ Client in Child Porn Case appeared first on Neal Davis Blog. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 8:52 am by Brent T. Zimmerman, Esq.
A recent federal appellate decision examined an issue regarding private construction projects on public land in District of Columbia v. [read post]