Search for: "FERGUSON v. STATE" Results 241 - 260 of 1,180
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2020, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
On 5 May 2020 Professor Neil Ferguson, the epidemiologist who advised on the UK coronavirus lockdown, quit as a government adviser after the  Daily Telegraph exposed him flouting the rules by receiving visits from his lover at his home. [read post]
7 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  After all, in 1841 we get the first of the Supreme Court’s slavery point-counter points in United States v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:05 am by Eugene Volokh
Council of Carpenters, 125 F.3d 1230, 1239 (9th Cir. 1997), upheld an anti-libel injunction, as did the unpublished Ferguson v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
United States The Verge had a piece on a group of Senate Republicans planning to introduce a privacy bill that would regulate the data collected by coronavirus contact tracing apps. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
  Nicklin J ruled that the meaning of Murray’s tweet was that Riley “had publicly stated in a tweet that he [Mr Corbyn] deserved to be violently attacked”. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
Northern Ireland The Belfast Telegraph reports that Lawyers who represented rugby player Paddy Jackson in the Belfast rape trial have issued defamation proceedings against former Ireland captain Rory Best, United States On 14 April 2020, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of McCafferty v Newsweek Media Group[pdf] dismissed an appeal by a 12 year old, CM, who had claimed that a Newsweek article had accused him of defending raw racism and sexual abuse. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 3:49 am by INFORRM
United States Just Security had a piece “Lawsuit against Fox News Over Coronavirus Coverage: Can It Succeed? [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 5:12 pm by INFORRM
” United States The creators of the Netflix series “When They See Us” are being sued for defamation. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Ferguson’s “separate but equal” principle — even after the judiciary announced the opposing mandate of Brown v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 3:50 pm by Kalvis Golde
” Thomas praised Justice John Marshall Harlan’s sole dissent in Plessy v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
  Following the Supreme Court’s decision in Lachaux, it will often be best to leave the matter for trial (see, for example, Steyn J, in James v Saunders [2019] EWHC 3265 (QB) at [16]-[17]), although as indicated by Warby J in Hamilton v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2020] EWHC 59 (QB) there will be cases where the issue can sensibly be dealt with at a preliminary trial. [read post]