Search for: "FERGUSON v. STATE" Results 81 - 100 of 1,194
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2023, 5:55 am by Michael Dreeben
That both the United States and Israel are wrestling with these fundamental questions makes this an opportune time to revisit them. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 4:47 pm by Mark Ashton
Reviewing C.G.,  a case known as Baby S. and Ferguson v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 12:03 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
[And this lawsuit faces many of the same administrative law hurdles as does AHM v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am by INFORRM
” 26 civil society groups, including Privacy International and Open Rights Group signed an open letter to Secretary of State, Michelle Donelan, stating that the “ill-considered proposals…endanger UK residents and UK data protection. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Chip Merlin
Under the McCarran-Ferguson Act, state laws regulating insurance are shielded from the preemptive effect of federal law. 15 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 5:31 am by Ryan Merkley
In the United States, the fair use doctrine allows the exploitation of a copyrighted work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 5:05 am by Chip Merlin
Presenters and attendees…must remember that their respective firms are competitors in the marketplace and that the McCarran-Ferguson Act and the laws of some states provide the insurance industry with only very limited immunity from federal and state antitrust scrutiny. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 8:00 am by Mark Graber
 State equality in the Senate constrains persons who believe in representation by population, configures politics by enabling low population states to receive far more than their fair share of federal funds, and constitutes politics when people assume that equal state representation is a natural feature of governance in the United States. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 3:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Regarding damages, “to survive a … pre·answer dismissal motion, a pleading need only state allegations from which damages attributable to the defendant’s conduct [or nonfeasance] may be reasonably inferred” (Lappin v Greenberg, 34 AD3d 277, 279 [1st Dept 2006] [internal citations omitted]). [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
 By Eric SegallThis was a no good, terrible, very bad year at the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  This process of judicial nullification culminated in Plessy v. [read post]