Search for: "FETTER v. STATE"
Results 1 - 20
of 136
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2015, 8:39 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 3:02 am
Regina (Rudewicz) v Secretary of State for Justice (Save Fawley Court Committee and others, interested parties) [2012] EWCA Civ 499; [2012] WLR (D) 121 “It was for the Secretary of State of Justice, as the licensing authority for the exhumation of human remains (other than the power of a consistory court to grant a faculty to exhume human remains interred in consecrated ground of the Anglican Church), to determine on what grounds and in… [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 9:00 am
State of Uttar Pradesh and Others, (2009) 12 SCC 26. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 10:32 am
Facts: This case (National Fair Housing Alliance et al v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Katz, Sabastian V. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Katz, Sabastian V. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 9:08 am
(R (Lumba) v Secretary of state for the Home Department (JUSTICE intervening) [2011] UKSC 12). [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 12:36 pm
Sonner v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 8:21 am
Here is the abstract: In Hughes v. [read post]
Case Comment: Hesham Ali (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 60 Part Two
13 Mar 2017, 2:42 am
The majority drew upon the case law of the ECtHR (Rodriguez Da Silva, Hoogkamer v Netherlands and Jeunesse v Netherlands). [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 2:31 pm
This was also the year of the rise of the core of leadership--in Turkey, Russia, China, the United States, Germany, and France. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 10:40 am
As such, consideration of ECHR, art 6 ought to have formed part of the Secretary of State’s decision-making process. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
The case was Reynolds v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 11:57 am
Peters v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 9:30 pm
DRE The HistPhil forum on the Dartmouth College v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
James Wolffe QC, now appears in support of the Respondents. 15.16 Lavery QC states that the will of Parliament should not overrule the will of the Irish people and that the triggering of article 50 without their consent would do just that. 15.14 Lavery QC says that Northern Ireland has a complex constitutional settlement that is legally binding as a result of section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998. 15.10 Lavery QC says that section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act… [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:30 am
” In U.S. v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 2:27 pm
R (MK & Anor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2011) CA (Civ Div) 14/4/2011 [Not on bailii, only a case note on lawtel]. [read post]
2 May 2011, 2:27 pm
R (MK & Anor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2011) CA (Civ Div) 14/4/2011 [Not on bailii, only a case note on lawtel]. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 5:19 pm
The Court found that the language of Article 301 does not impose any fetter on taxing power of States. [read post]
